View Single Post
Old 10-21-2004, 08:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rekna
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpieCunningham
Not that I am defending the Electoral College system in any way, but this is not a good idea. All this will do is dillute the intentions of the popular vote by averaging out the votes in any given state and assigning a disproportionate value to those votes.

For example, lets take two states, A and B. They each have 10 EVs and 20 million people.

If State A ends with a 11,000,000 to 9,000,000 popular vote, each candidate will receive (depending on how the values are averaged) either 5 EV or 6 for one and 4 for the other.

If State B ends with a 10,000,000 to 10,000,000 popular vote, each candidate will again receive 5 EV.

State A will either be eliminating the value of 1 million votes for each candidate or eliminating the value of 1 million votes for one candidate while doubling the value of 1 million votes for the other candidate (a 6 to 4 EV breakdown would imply a 12mil to 8 mil popular vote).

And this is worse then eliminating 9 million votes for one canidate while giving them to the other?
Rekna is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38