View Single Post
Old 11-01-2004, 02:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Mephisto2
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by daswig
I'll pass. There would need to be a REALLY good reason to restrict the freedom of the press, and that's what it would be.
There's already plenty of restrictions on the freedom of the press. Quite often because it is considered to be beneficial for particular reasons.

Opinion polls are unreliable by around 3% per 1000 samples according to a statician I heard discussing this on the radio yesterday. I believe the idea is that because of this unreliability, fundamentally inaccurate opinion polls can have an effect on the election. This is considered a bad thing, as people are basing their voting on erroneous data rather than on campaign issues.

At least I think that's the idea/reasoning behind it.


Mr Mephisto
Mephisto2 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73