Quote:
|
aren't being inconsistent. All I saw was that they were in a conundrum that could easily lead to that inconsistency. They should realize that trying to get from city C to city D involves denying many people the protection that they themselves are unwilling to give up.
|
Well, make them willing. Tax gun owership or make it criminal or make getting a gun liscence harder. Depending on how much cost you add to owning a gun, more people might decide they don't want to own a gun.
Quote:
|
That is a a problem of inconsistency, one that could be resolved by being an example to others first.
|
I don't demand that people who think that having fewer guns would be a good thing for society to be any more altruistic than anyone else. I don't require activists to be saints.
They could also do a better job at helping gun control if they lived like a begger and donated all their money to the cause.
Also note that this was one of the two examples of ways "I want to own a gun" and "guns should be harder to own" beliefs could be consistent. I don't know what people who think both think, I was just demonstrating consistent ways of thinking about both of them.
It could be that at
all points, owning a gun lowers your chance of dieing, while every person owning a gun makes society worse off as a whole. In which case, the "proper" economic response is to make people pay the externalities (the costs that everyone else pays) for owning a gun.
If someone believed that, the only consistent thing they could do is own a gun, and lobby that owning a gun would be harder. Anything else would be hypocritical.
I'd suspect Michael Moore might want find having an armed bodyguard justificable for completely different reasons. As examples:
First, I'd be shocked if he doesn't recieve lots of death threats from gun-nuts.
And, in theory, a bodyguard is a professional, who could be liscenced and regulated pretty heavily. Few people who want to ban handguns want to ban police from owning them.
But, I don't know Moore's mind, or the mind of any pro-gun restriction person who owns guns. All I'm trying to show is there exist consistent, sensible belief systems, for which those two on the surface opposite ideas are consistent.