Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
Either what I have posted earlier was ignored or forgotten. Did anyone choose to read the factcheck.org article? I posted the link, posted excerpts I thought were central to my arguement - and actually laid out my entire arguement to begin with. Obviously, something is missing.
|
Wow. I'll give this to you. You're very good. You almost had everyone fooled into thinking that was the point I addressed in my post to you. Unfortunately,
this is what I was replying to, NOT whether or not Bush lied:
Quote:
|
This issue has been driven into the ground and its baseless. It is nothing but an attempt by the left to bring down the bush administration. Do I have to find a writer in the NYT to write this first before I can post it?
|
You have no evidence that this is baseless, you have no evidence (hint: Rush Limbaugh does not count as evidence) that it's just petty bullshit from the left, yet you claim it to be.
Quote:
|
But when I do go out and get some unbiased sources and lay out my arguement for all to see...well look at the responses I get - they are quoted above.
|
Because your unbiased source said nothing whatsoever about what you were talking about in the statement that I replied to.
Quote:
|
p.s. clinton was IMPEACHED
|
Yes, which means he was put on trial, and then his case was "torn apart" when it came before congress. He was impeached, but was not convicted. Did you have a point with that? Or are you trying to say that anything Bush does, no matter how smarmy, is OK because a democrat back in history got impeached? Are you planning on using Clinton's impeachment as the excuse for any wrongdoing committed by your party for the rest of your life? I frankly hope not - that would be pretty pathetic.