View Single Post
Old 04-05-2006, 01:21 PM   #114 (permalink)
dksuddeth
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
And this is where we differ. You want to exterminate people? The fact that I disagree with the death penatly aside, it is up to the courts to decide whether or not we execute members of society. If you are a responsible gun owner, you will seek to DISABLE your assailent, not execute them. There is a big difference betwen the two, similar to the difference between a responsible gun owner and a gun nut.
IF we are to have a safe, civilized, and happy society then we can tolerate no evil. Now, when I say 'exterminate', I do not mean that I become judge, jury, and executioner. I am simply saying that those who commit heinous acts of violence upon people do not deserve the life that they have been given. As a responsible gun owner, my position is that I will seek to STOP the threat to my life, my families lives, or any innocent bystanders life. Does that mean that to 'disable', I should go for the knees? No. To me, it means I rely on what works to stop a threat, which is usually two to the chest and if that doesnt stop it, then two to the head.

Do I 'want' to kill the threat? No, but I will not shy away from it if necessary. I prefer the 'extermination' to be done through the justice system as an example to that criminal element, but I also want that criminal element to know that it CAN happen at the hands of their victim if necessary.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73