Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
(the title of the article, NOT my title)
I was reading around today and came across this (I really wasn't sure which forum to put this in, so feel free to move if need be).
http://baptistsforbrown2008.wordpres...on-of-seattle/
This was my response, so I reckon it's good enough to post here as well:
I am simply taken aback that these people are spewing this garbage and spouting such hate against a nation of people that helped in the fight as patriots for american freedom.
Women's clothing? Since when is a kilt womens clothing? Are they implying that just because a gay man might wear one that all of the sudden it is? Women do not wear kilts!!! The definition of "kilt" says its a MAN's form of dress, not a womens, so how can they be considered cross dressing?
Ugh.....as I said previously this simply makes me embarrassed to be in any way associated with religion.
You dont ever see a depiction of Jesus in pants, did that make him "gay" too? Did the people of the time wear those long "gowns" for lack of better word cause I dont know what they were called, just so they could have a quickie on the road? |
Shani, why would you try to delegate and coax a response from someone who holds such a strong bias against the 'taboos' of gays, kilts, and fornicating that the entire article should be discredited for lack of even a remote journalistic objectivivity. The entire length of the read just oozes "Your way is entirely wrong because it deviates from my way, you filthy heathens!"
"Never argue with a fool because you may just become one yourself by doing so." --attributed