Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
I read a lot of things.
|
I have not asked what you have read, I asked you why. There is a difference. If you ask me why I read a controversial book I could tell you why.
Quote:
|
I read the Turner Diaries several years before the Oklahoma City bombing. Using your logic that makes me a racists.
|
That is your twisted logic. If you re-read what I wrote you may understand the issue better. One of the choices was a waste of time or support. If it was a book of lies, written by a ghost writer - you clearly wasted your time, why did you make that choice?
Quote:
|
I could give you example, you'd make excuses... lets just save time. St. Sarah walks on water.
|
Make it about me, I have clearly stated I am a fan and supporter of Palin. I have also stated that her appeal has had nothing to do with her persuading me intellectually rather that we share similar points of view and that there is an emotional trigger. O.k., I put my issues on the table, your turn.
Quote:
|
And yes you do have a problem. Your post in this thread alone show a complete inability to understand or process even basic logic. I mean seriously read what you wrote-
|
You can answer simple questions directly or you can make your responses about Ace. Been done thousands of times and never changes anything. You telling me I have a problem is a waste of your time and won't stop me from confronting what I think are inconsistencies and lack of clarity.
Quote:
|
If I read something that contains theories or ideas I disagree with I'm wasting my time. What kind of logic is that?
|
You could just state why you read the book. Or, you could say, yes, reading the book was a waste of my time and initially I thought there may have been value in reading the book. But you did not for some reason, why?
---------- Post added at 10:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Unsound.
|
I have read many thing I disagree with, and I can tell you why I made the decision to read those things. I even read some things for pure joy or entertainment. The unsound comment is based on faulty assumptions you read into the questions presented. Now I question you - do you really not understand the point being made and you really believe based on what has actually been written, rather than faulty assumptions, what has been questioned has been done in a unsound manner? Is it possible that you don't understand? Is this all pretense for some other issue? It could be as simple as some here simply like making fun of and attacking Palin, if so why not say it.