Thread: Light Speed
View Single Post
Old 11-02-2003, 09:54 PM   #16 (permalink)
KnifeMissile
 
KnifeMissile's Avatar
 
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Quote:
Originally posted by teflonian
I think he was being a bit sarcastic there Knifemissle... I am suprised he was so kind in his response to your very patronising words.
Really? It seriously doesn't look sarcastic to me. It even has a winky smiley on it!

If it were just a small or simple mistake, I would simply have corrected it and moved on (nothing to see here...). However, when a post is that dense with egregious misinformation and as long and detailed as it was, that's not just a small or simple mistake. I was only a little patronizing, and there was no flaming whatsoever!

Quote:
It is my belief that it is more or less a given that what we post is information to the best of our own personal knowledge. I do agree with you on the point that we should take the time to correct what we believe to be misinformation. Take for example, your own post...
I don't entirely agree with you.
saltfish's post is so amazingly erroneous that I suspect it's mostly his own pet theories based on what little he does know or has heard, which is fine and not something I would ever condemn. However, I think we all recognize when we're sure of something or not and to post speculative information as if you're sure of yourself is what I'm trying to dissuade.

Quote:
Your point may be valid in a vacuum, but light does travel slower in air, glass, water, or any other medium besides a perfect vacuum.
Yeah, this has been brought up in Tilted Knowledge before and, I think, it was claimed that this happend because of the interaction between the light and the constituent particles of the medium. They absorb and re-emit the light and this interaction takes time. I'm not certain of this but I'm willing to take his word for it, for now. This would mean that light still travels at c in between the constituent particles and only it's macroscopic speed is below c. This would explain why this phenomenon has no bearing on relativistic effects. Special Relativity is based on how light travels at a constant speed, c, regardless of which reference frame you observe it from!
Still, what you say is correct, light travels less than c through a medium...
KnifeMissile is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360