Quote:
Originally posted by rsl12
anyways, my point is: the way that God is defined these days (omnipotente, omniscient, subtle, beyond grasp), it is very very difficult to come up with any method to prove/disprove existence, and that anyone can claim to be god using the current conventional definition of god.
The question of WHY the definition of God has evolved in such a way as to make such a proof continually elusive, I leave to cynics and skeptics.
also: i think the penis argument is quite valid. i will get my digital camera out to prove it next time. god is male.
|
I am sorry, I did not understand what you were trying to say in your original post. You are correct, any concept is possible but not all are probable.