Incredible Website, A must see
 

IFeelMyself - IFM

I don't know if I need to say much else.

Seems to be broken. :{&

Can only access it through google's cache (and there's not much to see on the main page).
I'm guessing it's moving video that's the main feature, but does the site also have premium image sets?

Nice site, reminds me of this site, which I love.

beautiful agony - facettes de la petite mort view

I love the site of a women in mid orgasm. Best thing in the world.

Great site. I've enjoyed their stuff along with the Abby Winters vids of the same sort for quite some time. They offer something special and much more real than the regular stuff where impossibly beautiful people read from a script and fuck like robots. Good stuff.

"An historic achievement in erotica. The beauty of authentic female orgasm beautifully filmed and tastefully presented."

...

It's porn.

Worked fine for me. Interesting. I'll have to take a look at it...erm...some other time.

Yeah, but the only two routes in porn on the net nowadays is to make it so horrible strange/disgusting that people download it for shock value or make it "art".

I don't know which one is easier, finding a crackwhore that will suck off a goat while a midget rams her from behind while wearing a cow costume or doing all this artist shit then coming up with a ludicrous backstory why it's art.

Ah, the fine line between "art" and "really good porn."

Hm... neither website posted in this thread seems to load for me. Quite odd. This has never happened before.

I've had network servers not able to connect / disconnect / outside of country jurisdictions /and just plain ol' shoddy wi-fi connections, but not even being able to load it, going to a blank new page, is just weird.

I'm not sure why people can't seem to access the site. It's I Feel Myself. Maybe google it? I'm really not sure.

Personally. I love it. I agree it's still a form of porn, sure. But it's more art to me than porn. I think it's nice. Real women, real orgasms. I like it.

Ifeelmyself - NudeVista tube search

can find a bunch of their vids here

Net Nanny'd...


[Did I do that right?]

I don't know, once the terms "orgasm" and "I feel myself" enter into a conversation art is the very last thing I'm thinking about. :D

Actually it does look kind of different, honestly some porn is...I don't know after awhile it all looks the same to me and starts crossing the horrifying line between HOT and medical film...and really what are you supposed to do when you're engines revving and all you can think about is anesthesia and paper shoes?

Anyway I'll check it out, thanks for posting.

I'm completely for real women and real orgasms, which is why I love amateur porn so much. Artsy tho? When did having real women in porn become art? Did I miss this memo?

I think the correct term in this case would be artful porn.
That said...
Porn is (largely) photography. And some photography is considered art. Therefore I see no reason why images of people having sex cannot be art. To purport that it cannot be is indicative of two things:
1. puritanism
or
2. disillusionment from the consumption of too much porn

I think the question is whether these images of people having sex are art.

well, I called them artful...but it's really subjective. do they speak to me in an emotional or compelling way? no. but it could be different for others.

The latter part was just a general statement on the subject overall.

For me I just wonder where the line is that divides Artisy Porn and Porn Art (like food porn, food that looks so freaking good it's unreal)? I'm at work, so I can't show pictures of what I mean, but there are some photographers out there that photograph beautiful women in wonderful ways, but it's still there to get lonely guys hard (or couples in the mood).

The Venus De Milo (or other renaissance art) does not get me hard. Met-Art (or other high quality sites) do get me hard. That's where I draw the line, what muscle it pulls on when I view it.

Should I just repost this in BG's thread? Maybe, then I might not get to talk about crack whores sucking goats off.

I first found beautifulagony.com years ago and loved it. Then I found ifeelmyself and it was even better. I have an archive of many of them and it definitely gets the most attention.

To the person who asked about hq sets, I think ishotmyself.com is the equivalent for that. In fact, the three sites I've mentioned may be owned by the same group. I don't know that.

Anyway, yeah; awesome site! Recommended to anybody who likes to see people getting off. Especially if you like the sound of macaroni and cheese.

I may just be old-fashioned, but porn to me, in it strictest definition, in which I've applied to it, involves penetration, in some form or another.

This might not adhere to all types, or all actions, but it does help to classify a certain "internet personality" as either a) a pornstar, or b) a nude/erotic model.

Awesome site! It's an old favorite. Nothing hotter than a woman coming, except maybe two women coming....

it works for me - very erotic

I absoluty love it! I'm glad others do as well, and I definitely understand the porn/art debate, but as others have said to me porn is different. That doesn't mean this this ISN"T porn, but to me porn is more, large chested incredibly made-up, often very surgically enhanced women being slammed up the ass with no foreplay or lubrication by a rather ugly guy with a large dick, until he is close to coming, at which point he gives her a facial.

It's all e-x-a-c-t-l-y the same to me. And it's starting to get VERY boring. This is a nice, fresh, fun alternitive.

The vast majority of the porn market is still pictures and videos of people fucking. That's what people buy so that's what the big studios make.

Whenever I search for porn, which is very rarely, that is exactly what I search for, a woman to masturbate herself and orgasm, that's all.

And that is why I hate porn, because it's so hard to find anything good and real.
I remember clicking on a video of a woman masturbating on some porn channel, and she's faking it.
Now what's the point in that?
I can tell she's faking it for the camera, for some ignorant guy who can't even tell she's faking it, geez.... how ridiculous. Demeaning to the woman, the observers, and to sexuality itself.

So thanks Salem!
Next time I'm in the mood I know where to go.
That trailer was pretty hot. Bonus points for no cocks!

So basically your definition of Art is that it doesn't sexually arouse you? That's got little to do with aesthetic or artistic value and more to do with a given region and period's ideal of beauty, back in the day Ms. Milo probably gave a whole lot of stiffies.

That's not my definition of art, it's my definition of porn that masquerades as art. I'm sure back in the day that a lot of the art that is out now sure caused a lot of petticoats to rise to the occasion.

I am a lover of art, I'm just big on the whole "porn as art" thing. I like real woman, real orgasms, real people in porn, but that doesn't make it art.

Yes.