Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2006, 12:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Vote to be a Millionaire!

Quote:
July 17, 2006
Arizona Ballot Could Become Lottery Ticket
By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD
LINK

TUCSON, July 13 — To anyone who ever said, “I wouldn’t vote for that bum for a million bucks,” Arizona may be calling your bluff.

A proposal to award $1 million in every general election to one lucky resident, chosen by lottery, simply for voting — no matter for whom — has qualified for the November ballot.

Mark Osterloh, a political gadfly who is behind the initiative, the Arizona Voter Reward Act, is promoting it with the slogan, “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Vote!” He collected 185,902 signatures of registered voters, far more than the 122,612 required, and last week the secretary of state certified the measure for the ballot this fall.

If the general election in 2004 is a guide, when more than 2 million people voted, the 1-in-2-million odds of winning the election lottery would be far better than the Powerball jackpot (currently about 1 in 146,107,962) but not nearly as great as dying from a lightning strike (1 in 55,928).

“People buy a lot of lottery tickets now,” Mr. Osterloh said, “and the odds of winning this are much, much higher.” (And most of the time there is not much lightning in Arizona.)

If some see the erosion of democracy in putting voting on the same plane as a scratch-and-win game — and some do — Mr. Osterloh sees the gimmick as the linchpin to improve voter turnout and get more people interested in politics.

In 2004, the year of a heated presidential election, 77 percent of registered voters cast ballots in Arizona, but in 2002 — the year Mr. Osterloh, a Democrat, ran for governor in what might politely be called a dark-horse campaign — it was 56 percent. Primary election turnouts are much lower.

About 60 percent of the voting-age population is registered, though that includes people who are ineligible to vote, like illegal immigrants and felons.

“Basically our government is elected by a small minority of citizens,” said Mr. Osterloh, 53, a semiretired ophthalmologist who has helped write and campaign for various successful ballot initiatives.

Curtis Gans, director of the Center for the Study of the American Electorate in Washington, said the idea of a voter lottery had come up in other states, but he could not recall any moving forward with it. And he’s glad.

“People should not go vote because they might win a lottery,” Mr. Gans said. “We need to rekindle the religion of civic duty, and that is a hard job, but we should not make voting crassly commercial.”

Editorial writers, bloggers and others have panned the idea as bribery and say it may draw people simply trying to cash in without studying candidates or issues.

“Bribing people to vote is a superficial approach that will have no beneficial outcome to the process, except to make some people feel good that the turnout numbers are higher,” said an editorial in The Yuma Sun. “But higher numbers do not necessarily mean a better outcome.”

The initiative calls for financing the award through unclaimed state lottery prize money, private donations and, if need be, state money. A spokeswoman for the Arizona Lottery Commission said its unclaimed prize pot fluctuated greatly, but it now stood at more than $1 million.

Mr. Osterloh said private donors could add their own incentives, like a car dealership offering a new car to a random voter.

But he may be getting ahead of himself. There is the not-so-small matter of whether such a voter lottery is legal.

Passage of the initiative would supersede a state law barring any exchange of a vote for money, legal experts agreed, but whether it would get around similar federal laws was a matter of debate.

One federal statute calls for fines or imprisonment of up to one year to anyone who “makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote.”

“It’s clearly illegal,” said Jack Chin, a professor at the University of Arizona law school who has studied voting rights issues.

“This is cute and clever, but even though it responds to a real problem, it does so in a way that threatens to degrade the process,” Mr. Chin said.

But Mr. Osterloh, who has a law degree, and the lawyer who helped write the initiative, Anthony B. Ching, a former state solicitor general, said the laws were meant to stop individuals from buying or selling votes for particular candidates or parties. In this case, it would be a state-sanctioned program with a high purpose and, they add, offering the chance to win — voters opt into the program — was not the same as giving everybody money to vote.

“I don’t think the federal law would cover this kind of situation,” Mr. Ching said.

State political leaders so far are keeping their distance.

Gov. Janet Napolitano, a Democrat who will also be on the November ballot as a candidate for reelection, has declined to take a position. The leaders of the State Senate and House, both Republicans, did not answer messages seeking comment.

But Mr. Osterloh presses on. He predicted the idea would spread to the two dozen states that allow citizen ballot initiatives if it was successful here.

The local chapter of We Are America, a group seeking to register Latinos to vote after large pro-immigration demonstrations last spring, plans to promote the initiative in its voter education and registration drives.

“We’ve certainly tried everything else, and people don’t seem to turn out,” said Roberto Reveles, president of the group.

And some voters are giving it serious thought.

“I’m pretty up on the issues, so I don’t need it,” said Beverly Winn, a grocery store clerk here. “But who wouldn’t take money if they offer it?”
In Australia you can be fined for not going to the polls to register to vote. In America voter apathy is quite high. There are already lots of ways for voter fraud to happen from registered dead people to multiple votes per person. I see this as another way that someone can abuse the system, the ultimate "bribe" to convince someone to vote.

I vote no for this if I could.

What are you thoughts? Would this actually finally lure you to the polls?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Misanthropic
 
Crack's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio! yay!
What if I vote twice? 2 in 2 million chance (or 1-1 million?) Those odds arn't so bad!
__________________
Crack, you and I are long overdue for a vicious bout of mansex.

~Halx
Crack is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rookie
 
Gatorade Frost's Avatar
 
I would only vote on this if I were entered into a lotto for millions...
__________________
I got in a fight one time with a really big guy, and he said, "I'm going to mop the floor with your face." I said, "You'll be sorry." He said, "Oh, yeah? Why?" I said, "Well, you won't be able to get into the corners very well."
Emo Philips
Gatorade Frost is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Since its been shown that less informed voters vote democrat such ploys like motor voting and now this will be rejected by republicans and pushed by democrats. (Now before this starts a needless flame war, that is not saying all democrats are uninformed, but IF you are uninformed you tend to vote democrat, and no I'm not providing links, I am busy making money to pay taxes here)

I've always thought the uninterested and uninformed should be kept away from the polls. This whole voting is a civic duty is kind of assinine.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.

Last edited by Ustwo; 07-17-2006 at 02:05 PM.. Reason: Don't post while working and not paying attention
Ustwo is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Searching for the perfect brew!
 
Brewmaniac's Avatar
 
I'd vote early and often!
__________________
"That's a joke... I say, that's a joke, son"
Brewmaniac is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
frogza's Avatar
 
Location: Right Here
Another case of rewarding people for doing no more than what they should be doing in the first place. It's pathetic. But then I'm of the mind set that if someone is too lazy or stupid to vote, I really don't want their oponion counting anyway. Let them stay home watching their reality tv and eating their big macs, it will leave more space for those of us who prefer to live rather than just exist.
frogza is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 12:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Infinite_Loser's Avatar
 
Location: Lake Mary, FL
A reason to vote!

...Well, other than electing politicians.
Infinite_Loser is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 02:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Deja Moo
 
Elphaba's Avatar
 
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Since its been shown that less informed voters vote democrat such ploys like motor voting and now this will be rejected by republicans and pushed by democrats. (Now before this starts a needless flame war, that is not saying all democrats are uninformed, but IF you are uninformed you tend to vote democrat, and no I'm not providing links, I am busy making money to pay taxes here)

I've always thought the uninterested and uninformed should be kept away from the polls. This whole voting is a civic duty is kind of assinine.
Ustwo, weren't you the one that posted that the majority of people with advanced degrees are liberals?

If someone doesn't view voting as a civic responsibility, I would prefer that they stayed home.
Elphaba is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 02:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Adequate
 
cyrnel's Avatar
 
Location: In my angry-dome.
I hope someone is paying attention to what's random.
__________________
There are a vast number of people who are uninformed and heavily propagandized, but fundamentally decent. The propaganda that inundates them is effective when unchallenged, but much of it goes only skin deep. If they can be brought to raise questions and apply their decent instincts and basic intelligence, many people quickly escape the confines of the doctrinal system and are willing to do something to help others who are really suffering and oppressed." -Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, p. 195
cyrnel is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 04:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
Easy Rider
 
flstf's Avatar
 
Location: Moscow on the Ohio
I don't understand what possible benefit can be derived by having people vote who's only reason for voting is to get a lottery ticket. Maybe a better plan would be to give those people a lottery ticket for not voting.
flstf is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pissing in the cornflakes
 
Ustwo's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
I don't understand what possible benefit can be derived by having people vote who's only reason for voting is to get a lottery ticket. Maybe a better plan would be to give those people a lottery ticket for not voting.
Now THAT is a winner.
__________________
Agents of the enemies who hold office in our own government, who attempt to eliminate our "freedoms" and our "right to know" are posting among us, I fear.....on this very forum. - host

Obama - Know a Man by the friends he keeps.
Ustwo is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 07:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Insane
 
cookmo's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Since its been shown that less informed voters vote democrat such ploys like motor voting and now this will be rejected by republicans and pushed by democrats. (Now before this starts a needless flame war, that is not saying all democrats are uninformed, but IF you are uninformed you tend to vote democrat, and no I'm not providing links, I am busy making money to pay taxes here)

I've always thought the uninterested and uninformed should be kept away from the polls. This whole voting is a civic duty is kind of assinine.

Ustwo-heres a link, I have no life

http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=949
cookmo is offline  
Old 07-17-2006, 10:58 PM   #13 (permalink)
Delicious
 
Reese's Avatar
 
There's no way I'd support this. People should vote because they believe in the candidate, not because they want to win a lottery. This basically turns the whole voting process into a coin toss and takes power away from individual legit votes.
__________________
“It is better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick” - Dave Barry
Reese is offline  
Old 07-18-2006, 06:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
Leaning against the -Sun-
 
little_tippler's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: on the other side
A bad reason to go and vote... how twisted.
__________________
Whether we write or speak or do but look
We are ever unapparent. What we are
Cannot be transfused into word or book.
Our soul from us is infinitely far.
However much we give our thoughts the will
To be our soul and gesture it abroad,
Our hearts are incommunicable still.
In what we show ourselves we are ignored.
The abyss from soul to soul cannot be bridged
By any skill of thought or trick of seeming.
Unto our very selves we are abridged
When we would utter to our thought our being.
We are our dreams of ourselves, souls by gleams,
And each to each other dreams of others' dreams.


Fernando Pessoa, 1918
little_tippler is offline  
Old 07-18-2006, 09:09 AM   #15 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
I don't know.

On the one hand, it seems a bit distasteful, but on the other...

If a lottery drew more voters to the poll then a greater swath of the electorate would be represented, right? A true representative government, for better or for worse. I don't think it would do all that much damage anyway.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
Old 07-18-2006, 09:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Shrug, hard to say. I think they might be just as informed as 80% of the current people voting. Apathetic =/= stupid. I'd say it's worth trying, but I realize I could easily be wrong.
Zeraph is offline  
Old 07-18-2006, 10:23 AM   #17 (permalink)
Falling Angel
 
Sultana's Avatar
 
Location: L.A. L.A. land
I'd rather have an interested, informed 5% of the populace voting over 80% voting only to try to win a wad of cash.
__________________
"Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra and then suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath.
At night, the ice weasels come." -

Matt Groening


My goal? To fulfill my potential.
Sultana is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 06:32 AM   #18 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Eweser's Avatar
 
Location: O-K-L-A-H-O-M-A
I am of two minds: on one hand voting shouldn't be a "game", but on the other, I don't know that people who vote currently, without the lure of money, are all that informed about the candidates......and in some cases it actually might cause a person to get more politically informed/involved.
__________________
"Whoever wrote this episode should die!"
Eweser is offline  
Old 07-19-2006, 07:20 AM   #19 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultana
I'd rather have an interested, informed 5% of the populace voting over 80% voting only to try to win a wad of cash.
How are the opportunistic 80% any different than the mass of single-issue voters that already make up the mass of the voting pool?

Is it the promise of monetary reward that's frowned on? How is that any different than voting for a candidate that promises to reward the voter's pocketbook by promising to cut taxes and larger "tax refunds?"
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.

Last edited by guthmund; 07-19-2006 at 07:24 AM..
guthmund is offline  
 

Tags
millionaire, vote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360