Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Knowledge and How-To


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-24-2004, 12:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Capturing Light

Ok.. this is purely conceptual, but here goes - and follow along with me and try to realize what I'm describing...

We know light moves really fast and usually has a direct source that we can pin-point. Would it be possible to capture light in a box? The box would have to be perfectly reflective on the inside so that no part of the surface could absorb any of the light.

First, with the box slightly open, light shines in. Then, with light constantly bouncing off the insides of the box, it's closed up (theoretically, it's closed up faster than the speed of light).

Would the light be 'trapped' inside the box and continue to bounce off the perfectly reflective surfaces? Would the light then escape from the box in and instant once it was opened?

My brain is weird.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 07-24-2004, 03:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
Americow, the Beautiful
 
Supple Cow's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, D.C.
I think the light would lose heat energy (a little with each bounce) because your box could never be 100% efficient. The light would just dim and eventually go out... unless this concept also involved a box that also reflected heat at 100% efficiency. How much reality are we trying to maintain here?
__________________
"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."
(Michael Jordan)
Supple Cow is offline  
Old 07-24-2004, 03:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Cow has it right, its just the same as the idea of trapping sound or creating perpetual motion. Light is created by a reaction that has a certain force. Once the force is diffused it is no longer light but rather the remnants of it.

If you want something interesting, read up on quantum theory. at any time there is an infintesimal chance that a carrot riding a bicycle will pop into your room, or you could teleport to another dimension. Also quantum theory states that light even if you could keep it at full power within the box would eventually escape through the same ways. *we are talking 10 to the nth power chance though*
__________________
"How soft your fields so green, Can whisper tales of gore"
"Thou art god"
jaco is offline  
Old 07-25-2004, 06:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Insane
 
yatzr's Avatar
 
i've always thought about something similar. Placing small mirrors in a position such that pointing a laser at one will send the laser beam into a repeated circuit of mirrors. Then the beam would just keep going in circles and never be able to leave.
__________________
Mechanical Engineers build weapons. Civil Engineers build targets.
yatzr is offline  
Old 07-25-2004, 07:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Here to Help My Fellow TFP'er
 
Dawson70's Avatar
 
Location: All over the Net....(ok Wisconsin)
Without the Partition Theory, nothing can generate it's own power.
Only "pure" light can be reflected with a "generic source" ie, flashlight (for all intents and purposes) Pure light can only be generated thru a perfect refractor. No such element has been made or discovered thus far. Once this refractor is made possible, the theory of light travel (quatum physics) will be possible.
Just an FYI: NASA has been trying to build such a refractor for over 30 years. They have spent over 13 billion dollars on the research and have not had any success. It's a good question and a fascinating subject.
__________________
"I Finally Finished My Goal....You Can Too!

Yippie Ki Ya...
Dawson70 is offline  
Old 07-25-2004, 09:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
On the lam
 
rsl12's Avatar
 
Location: northern va
a theoretical box is sometimes used to help explain special relativity to students. If you imagine a beam of light reflecting between two mirrors in a box, and you carry that box with you when you go on a really fast airplane, observing the way the light behaves is a good way of getting understanding of the time dilation and contraction effects.
__________________
oh baby oh baby, i like gravy.
rsl12 is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 10:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
It's been several years since my quantum course so pardon me if I'm totally wrong but wouldn't the photons lose momentum with each collision within the box? Eventually, the wavelenths would shift to lower energy wavelengths and you wouldn't be able to see the light anymore?
kutulu is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 05:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Ithaca, New York
photons can't lose momentum. the photon momentum is determined by it's energy/frequency. And, since it's called quantum physics, a phonton can only be fully absorbed or not at all. You can't absorb only part of a photon (of course, a material can absorb a photon and then spit out another photon of some fraction of the energy of the original, thus effectively absorbing part of the photon). Anyway, there was a thread a couple months ago about this very subject. See here:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...threadid=54544
__________________
And if you say to me tomorrow, oh what fun it all would be.
Then what's to stop us, pretty baby. But What Is And What Should Never Be.
fckm is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 11:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: somewhere out there
What about optical hard drives? How do those work, or is what I heard total BS?
__________________
boom
kinsaj is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 09:30 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
From what I recall, an optical hard drive is kind of like a multi-layer dvd. Data is stored in small images that are stacked on top of each other.

They are amazingly fast at retrieving data and the amount of data stored per unit volume is huge. The downside is that as of now the writing process is painstakingly slow.

fckm:

http://online.cctt.org/physicslab/co...re/Compton.asp

When the photon collides with the crystal in this example, it re-emerges from the crystal with a longer wavelength and therefore less energy and less momentum. Are you saying that the photon with the longer wavelength is not the same one that collided with the object?
kutulu is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 02:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
All hail the Mountain King
 
the_marq's Avatar
 
Location: Black Mesa
Halx did say PERFECTLY reflective. Sort of like the theoretical fritionless surface.

If the inside of the box was perfectly reflective and the beam of light lost no energy with each "collision" then in theory we might be able to create a sort of "light battery." But I doubt it.
__________________
The Truth:

Johnny Cash could have kicked Bruce Lee's ass if he wanted to.

#3 in a series
the_marq is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 08:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Ithaca, New York
kutulu:
well, yeah, more or less. Think about it this way. I have a blue laser. It only produces one wavelength, lets say... 400nm.
Now, i have a crystal that only absorbes red light. This means that the separation of the energy levels of the crystal correstpond to red light, of say... 700nm.
So, if I shine the laser on the crystal, the light passes through with NO absorption. This happens even though the blue light is at a higher energy (lower wavelength) than the energy separation of the crystal. Classically, this makes no sense. The blue light has plenty of energy, it should be absorbed by the crystal. But, according to quantum mechanics, (well, QED, quantum electrodynamics) this doesn't happen. And indeed, experiments confir m this.
EDIT:
as for Compton, the electron is no long in a bound state, so it's energy levels are no longer discrete. I'm not too sure how this effects photon absorption/reimission.
And remember, as much as a photon is a particle, it is also a quantization of the field. In some cases, especially when there is light-matter interaction, it doesn't really make sense to talk about "the same photon". Matter takes a certain amount of energy from the field, and gives a certain amount back. The energy is quantized in multiples of plank's constant. Beyond that, whether the photon is the same or not doesn't really matter.
A photon pretty much has three properties, wavelength/momentum, spin, and polarization. If these are the same before and after an interaction, then you can think of the photon as being the "same", it doesn't really matter. (unless you're talking about entropy and information destruction)
__________________
And if you say to me tomorrow, oh what fun it all would be.
Then what's to stop us, pretty baby. But What Is And What Should Never Be.

Last edited by fckm; 07-28-2004 at 08:24 PM..
fckm is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 08:32 PM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Ithaca, New York
As for the perfectly reflecting box. I seem to remember thinking about that in E&M class. For now, I'll say that you could, in this impossibel case, make a 'light battery'. I do seem to recall there being problems with beam injection and interference patterns and something doesn't work out quite right. i don't remember what it was but if I do, i'll post it here.
__________________
And if you say to me tomorrow, oh what fun it all would be.
Then what's to stop us, pretty baby. But What Is And What Should Never Be.
fckm is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 09:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Insane
 
Phage's Avatar
 
Hmm, a perfectly reflective mirror is going to be difficult to come by; might it be more possible to make a sort of gravity bottle? In that case it might be possible to inject light into what amounts to space bent in on itself, so the light is traveling in an infinite loop. With this system no energy would be lost at all, and the capacity for storage could perhaps be limitless. Of course, constructing one of these containers would be really hard, and it would probably be difficult to do anything nearby. It would also have to be adjustable, because as you added a lot of energy it would get a gravity field of its own...
Phage is offline  
Old 07-29-2004, 06:30 AM   #15 (permalink)
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
i remember an article in pop sci about trapping light.

the used a laser to melt a substance that turns clear when its melted and shined a second laser through it. when the melting laser was shut off a smnall bit of light was trapped insid of the substance.

if i find the article ill scan it up.
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
Old 07-29-2004, 09:46 AM   #16 (permalink)
Upright
 
fckm->

That's not entirely true, as the absorbtion spectrum looks like a lorentzian centered on 700nm. A Lorentzian is like a gaussian with larger "wings", and doesn't ever quite go to zero. So given enough passes through the crystal it will still absorb a blue photon. Oh, and scattering processes don't have the same narrow spectrum, so you can still get things like rayleigh scattering. You can also excite vibrational modes in the crystal lattice.

Oh, btw, I have a 493nm blue laser that I use to cool and trap single atoms.
mpgreen is offline  
Old 07-30-2004, 05:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: Ithaca, New York
mpgreen: having not taken solid state or lasers yet, i'll defer to your expertise. I was ignoring vibrational modes. I figured since we're talking about "perfect mirrors" ...
One question tho, is the absorbtion spectrum empirical, or theoretical? Is the orentzian the solution to the two state system? (i just took this last semester, i can't believe i'm forgetting already)
__________________
And if you say to me tomorrow, oh what fun it all would be.
Then what's to stop us, pretty baby. But What Is And What Should Never Be.
fckm is offline  
Old 07-31-2004, 01:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
Psycho
 
My atoms hurt.
insidious_machinae is offline  
Old 08-01-2004, 10:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
MSD
The sky calls to us ...
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally posted by Dilbert1234567
i remember an article in pop sci about trapping light.

the used a laser to melt a substance that turns clear when its melted and shined a second laser through it. when the melting laser was shut off a smnall bit of light was trapped insid of the substance.

if i find the article ill scan it up.
Was that the Harvard cesium vapor light trap?
MSD is offline  
Old 08-04-2004, 10:59 AM   #20 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: under a rock
This is a bit off topic but a scientist at MIT managed to slow light down by passing it through a super-cooled tube. Dunno if that adds anything to your thought processes.
__________________
There's no justice. There's just us.
Acetylene is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 08:20 AM   #21 (permalink)
Non-Rookie
 
NoSoup's Avatar
 
Location: Green Bay, WI
Quote:
Originally posted by Acetylene
This is a bit off topic but a scientist at MIT managed to slow light down by passing it through a super-cooled tube. Dunno if that adds anything to your thought processes.
Y'know, this just goes to show how little we know about light, and likely the universe in general.

Many of our beliefs are based on the speed of light being a constant, and the fact that it can be slowed by conventional means makes me believe that we are grossly incorrect.

I suppose, though, that it isn't too surprising as gravity is able to affect light as well.
__________________
I have an aura of reliability and good judgement.

Just in case you were wondering...
NoSoup is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 09:20 PM   #22 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by NoSoup
Y'know, this just goes to show how little we know about light, and likely the universe in general.

Many of our beliefs are based on the speed of light being a constant, and the fact that it can be slowed by conventional means makes me believe that we are grossly incorrect.

I suppose, though, that it isn't too surprising as gravity is able to affect light as well.
no the speed of light being constant means in a vaccum. it's different in the air/water esc. remember, light travesl through no medium. what they mean by "slowing" probably means that the light hits so many obstacles and bounces so much, it takes a long time for it to travel through. the speed of light IS constant but for practicality sake, the number "C" is the measurement of hte speed of light in vaccum as the light travels without hitting anything, hope this explains something ----- [/off topic]
orphen is offline  
Old 08-12-2004, 06:39 PM   #23 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: The Internet
As mentioned, there was a post about this some time ago.

The "theoretical box" would have to reflect 100% of the EM energy that is light. The photons will expecience a "lamda shift" and eventually lose all energy to adsorption. Blue light would eventually fade to red, and down to radio, and subsequently further down the spectrum ...

Energy always flows down hill - this is an important concept to remember in these conceptual situations.
__________________
rm -f /bin/laden
Sapper is offline  
Old 11-15-2004, 04:32 PM   #24 (permalink)
Born-Again New Guy
 
TexanAvenger's Avatar
 
Location: Unfound.
"Sort of like the theoretical fritionless surface."

I know this is off topic, but I think I remember supercritical helium-2 is frictionless. If not, it's pretty damn near it.
TexanAvenger is offline  
 

Tags
capturing, light

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360