Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Philosophy (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/)
-   -   Sex of God? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/49787-sex-god.html)

Xothan 03-21-2004 02:20 PM

Sex of God?
 
Why do people put a sex to God? (I'm referring to the Christian God) I just don't understand how an all-powerful being could be even remotely similar to his creations (yes, I know we were created "in his image," but I imagine that to lie more along the lines of free will and intelligence, not actual physical resemblance). This question has bugged me for a while, and I was just wondering if anyone else had some thoughts.

Mantus 03-21-2004 02:47 PM

The idea of God being a male obviously has roots in the ancient and rather male dominant world.

The major reason why we continue to use the adjectives “he” or “she” is because the English language forces us too. If we personify a living thing then we immediately have to attach a reference to it’s sex.

asaris 03-21-2004 02:56 PM

Well, most Christians believe that the Bible was inspired by God (though they disagree on exactly what that means). One thing noteworthy, as I pointed out in another thread, is that while the Bible occasionally uses feminine imagery to refer to God ("O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!" Luke 13:34), it never uses it to refer to God directly. In fact, when his disciples ask Jesus how to pray, he tells them to address them as Father. So, under this line of reasoning, we call God Father, because that's what he wants us to call him.

Three notes to append:

1. No one really believes that God has a sex. Some, but not most, might believe he has a gender, but not a sex.

2. But, technically speaking, if we really wanted to assign God a sex, it would have to be male. Traditionally Christians have believed in, not only the bodily resurrection of Christ, but his bodily ascension. And since Christ was obviously male... That's really just nitpicking though.

3. I was sure I had a third point just a second ago, but it seems to have slipped my mind. If it comes back to me, I'll edit.

SecretMethod70 03-21-2004 03:18 PM

As usual, I can't speak for other Christian religions (although I suspect most agree), but the Catholic Church doesn't assign a sex to God at all. From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

Quote:

42: God transcends all creatures. We must therefore continually purify our language of everything in it that is limited, image-bound or imperfect, if we are not to confuse our image of God—"the inexpressible, the incomprehensible, the invisible, the ungraspable"—with our human representations. Our human words always fall short of the mystery of God.

239: By calling God "Father," the LANGUAGE of faith indicates two main things: that God is the first origin of everything and transcendent authority; and that he is at the same time goodness and loving care for all his children. God's parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood, which emphasizes God's immanence, the intimacy between Creator and creature. The language of faith thus draws on the human experience of parents, who are in a way the first representatives of God for man. But this experience also tells us that human parents are fallible and can disfigure the face of fatherhood and motherhood. We ought therefore to recall that God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman: he is God. He also transcends human fatherhood and motherhood, although he is their origin and standard no one is father as God is Father.

370: In no way is God in man's image. He is neither man nor woman. God is pure spirit in which there is no place for the difference between the sexes. But the respective "perfections" of man and woman reflect something of the infinite perfection of God: those of a mother and those of a father and husband.

03-21-2004 03:51 PM

Not really much to add, except to say that the idea from the movie Dogma always appealed to me... the idea that we project our own image onto God. ie a female would think God was female, etc....

TheKak 03-21-2004 09:34 PM

My dog told me that God looks like a dog!

Seer666 03-22-2004 02:48 PM

Well, I thing Carlin hit it dead on. God has to be a man. No woman would or could fuck things up so bad.

filtherton 03-22-2004 06:30 PM

If god is a male then there have to be female gods right? Gender is function of reproduction. If god is male than there must be at least one female god to make his maleness meaningful. Does a male god have some sort of phallic manifestation? Isn't that how we define maleness?

I don't think the idea holds any water.

As for having to use the masculine pronoun, i always learned that god is god, no pronouns apply.

Seer666 03-22-2004 10:15 PM

Well, it does say something about "THou shall have no other Gods before me". Now, that doesn't say "no oter Gods". Just means no matter waht, you have to put Him at the top of the food chain. With that veiw, you could very eaisly have other, maybe female gods. If you are someone that feels the need to asign sex...

Lunchbox7 03-23-2004 07:17 AM

Its human nature to feel more associated with beings that resemble ourselves. Human ego. Thus humans like to think of God in the image of a human therefor must have a sex.

losthellhound 03-23-2004 08:30 AM

God doesn't have to have a sex, it's a GOD!

Seer666 03-27-2004 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by losthellhound
God doesn't have to have a sex, it's a GOD!
Look at the Roman and Greek gods. They all had a sex. And sex could also be used as a term to descibe more then just reproductive organs. Mind set as well, can be broken down to masculine and feminin.

SecretMethod70 03-28-2004 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Seer666
Look at the Roman and Greek gods. They all had a sex. And sex could also be used as a term to descibe more then just reproductive organs. Mind set as well, can be broken down to masculine and feminin.
Yes, but the poster is referring to the Christian God and to my knowledge few, if any, Christian religions actually believe that God has a sex.

asaris 03-28-2004 11:38 AM

Seer666: usually, when people are being careful in their use of language, sex = having reproductive organs of a certain sort and gender = being inclined in a certain way, i.e., masculine or feminine. Just trying to be helpful; I'm by no means any more careful with my language on a regular basis than anyone else.

losthellhound 03-29-2004 11:39 AM

Quote:

Look at the Roman and Greek gods. They all had a sex. And sex could also be used as a term to descibe more then just reproductive organs. Mind set as well, can be broken down to masculine and feminin.
Those gods and goddesses had a sex because the origin, and the understanding of those dieties required them. Remember though that the lines between sexes was different. Zeus was male, but had a daughter (Athena) by himself without Hera, split open his head and voila..

In the old testament God is God... no sex needed

Yakk 03-29-2004 01:10 PM

Oh my god, I get it now!

Lucifer's expulsion was a domestic dispute.

;-)

thespian86 03-29-2004 01:12 PM

I always assumed that "Created in his image" was why man, Adam, was created first... Women, were created second, but not that is because importence... I always believed that women were created as man, only altered slightly for reproduction purposes... Women, they amaze me...

adia 03-30-2004 01:05 AM

I have personally always favored the god demonstated by Plotinus ( around 260 b.c.) where god was nothing humanoid at all. it was simply the most perfect one thing that existed, and it didn't need your acknowledgment to be perfect. also, anything that we expereince as existing is "contained" within the god(something that ole Spinoza liked to talk about). But in the end it's all just Aristotle all over again, just like everything.

SecretMethod70 03-30-2004 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by adia
I have personally always favored the god demonstated by Plotinus ( around 260 b.c.) where god was nothing humanoid at all.
That's pretty much what most (all?) Christian religions believe.

adia 03-30-2004 04:13 PM

the god of the old testament demonstrates a lot of strange
human qualities. granted that it may all be working as a parable, a tool to transfer an idea, but the bible just doesn't have that logical way of saying this is what god would have to be.

(of course, its been awhile, like a year or something, since i'ce really read the bible. i'm on other philosphy at school)

Dilbert1234567 03-30-2004 11:16 PM

male, a woman could never screw things up like this.

Lebell 03-30-2004 11:36 PM

Rather than saying God has no sex (asexual) I prefer to say that God encompasses ALL sexes.

analog 03-31-2004 02:27 AM

I think to think of God, rather than by sex or static image, as a force that we perceive in a manner that is possible for us to understand, and is generally pleasing.

I think God will look different to every person, as no single image could be sufficient to visually represent him. To me, God might be an older gentleman who reminds me of my passed grandfather, which would comfort me. To another, God may be female because that is what that particular person interprets God to look like in their mind.

Besides, it's silly to assume that God would be tied down to just one form anyway. That kinda belies the whole all-powerful thing, dont' you all think? :)

SecretMethod70 03-31-2004 02:38 AM

Precisely. Really, the idea of trying to attribute any "form" at all to God is silly IMO. God simply is.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360