Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2006, 07:51 AM   #41 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
here is the first post regarding neofascist parties in western europe--i concentrated on the front national first because i am most familiar with them and because they are among the models for most neofascist organizations, organizationally and ideologically.

there is a ton of stuff available in french, but less in english.
so i opted to bite only english material, even though it is not a comparably quality or quantity.
if you read french, you should have a look at the fn's website for its own summary of its platform.
also have a look at the dispute page on the wikipedia article.




a summary taken from a 1989 analysis of the french Front National.
the rest of the analysis is available at the link below.

Quote:
The Political Ideas of Le Front National

Before moving on to consider the reasons for the Front National's recent electoral sucesses, it is useful to consider some of the ideas that they represent. Although the details of their political programme undergo slight changes from year to year, there are a number of important areas of consistency. The Front National has been consistently hostile towards:
the dominant political parties - the Front National is very much an `anti-party' party and Le Pen frequently denounces la bande des quatre of the PS, the PCF, the RPR and the UDF - who he accuses of being both corrupt and devoid of practical ideas to solve France's problems;

the Left, i.e. Socialists, Communists, trade unionists, in particular, all of whom have contributed to the `degeneration' of the French nation;

immigrants and ethnic minorities, especially those from North and Sub-Saharan Africa, who are draining France's resources, causing crime and unrest and undermining the integrity of French national identity;

closer European integration and Brussels-based bureaucrats;

homosexuals - Le Pen advocates isolating AIDS sufferers from society by placing them in a special `sidatorium';

intellectuals, especially those of the Left or homosexuals (see above);

the `permissive society', encouraged by Left-wingers, homosexuals, and feminists in the 1960s and 1970s;

reproductive choice for women (especially abortion).

On the other hand, the Front National has shown great support for:
the definitive closure of France's borders to non-European migrants and the end to family reunification (le regroupement familial);

the restricting the number of asylum seekers allowed residence (le droit d'asile);

the repatriation of three million non-European immigrants, starting with the unemployed and delinquents (on the grounds that they are responsible for unemployment, crime and civic unrest);

the reduction of benefits and access to housing allowed to those remaining - `les Français de souche' to be given preference when distributing benefts and housing;

restricting access to full French citizenship to immigrants;

the repeal of the anti-racist legislation introduced in 1972 and 1990 - Le Pen described these pieces of legislation as `liberticides' (i.e. they destroyed the right to free speech);

the creation of a special National Guard to prevent any civic unrest or subversion by immigrants;

a tough line on law and order - more powers to the police, reintroduction of capital punishment;

the family, i.e. the nuclear family of father (le gagne-pain), mother (femme au foyer and children.
source: http://www.sunderland.ac.uk/~os0tmc/contemp1/lepen.htm

a bibiliography site:
http://www.fyifrance.com/FN/fnweb.htm#FrancePolitiqueFN

the Front National website's summary of the party's positions on immigration (which is of a piece with its position regarding islam)--in french:

http://www.frontnational.com/doc_prop_identite.php

another short english article about the fn:
http://www.irr.org.uk/europe/france.htm

the wikipedia article regarding the front national (along with a very strange dispute page regarding its neutrality, etc..)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_National_(France)

====================================

from the above, the fjordman's political position should be clear--work it out for yourself, the co-ordinates are obvious.


addendum:

this is a nice compact comparative website on neofascism in general.
this should be enough to erase and ambiguity about the positioning of mr. fjordman and about what i meant above concerning the blog from which the op was drawn.

http://www.bookrags.com/wiki/Neo-Fascism
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite

Last edited by roachboy; 10-08-2006 at 09:02 AM..
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 06:36 AM   #42 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
here is the first post regarding neofascist parties in western europe--i concentrated on the front national first because i am most familiar with them and because they are among the models for most neofascist organizations, organizationally and ideologically.

there is a ton of stuff available in french, but less in english.
so i opted to bite only english material, even though it is not a comparably quality or quantity.
if you read french, you should have a look at the fn's website for its own summary of its platform.
also have a look at the dispute page on the wikipedia article.

a summary taken from a 1989 analysis of the french Front National.
the rest of the analysis is available at the link below.

source: http://www.sunderland.ac.uk/~os0tmc/contemp1/lepen.htm

a bibiliography site:
http://www.fyifrance.com/FN/fnweb.htm#FrancePolitiqueFN

the Front National website's summary of the party's positions on immigration (which is of a piece with its position regarding islam)--in french:

http://www.frontnational.com/doc_prop_identite.php

another short english article about the fn:
http://www.irr.org.uk/europe/france.htm

the wikipedia article regarding the front national (along with a very strange dispute page regarding its neutrality, etc..)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_National_(France)

====================================

from the above, the fjordman's political position should be clear--work it out for yourself, the co-ordinates are obvious.

addendum:

this is a nice compact comparative website on neofascism in general.
this should be enough to erase and ambiguity about the positioning of mr. fjordman and about what i meant above concerning the blog from which the op was drawn.

http://www.bookrags.com/wiki/Neo-Fascism
I'm sorry rocah, but that doesn't do it for me. What I just read was a lesson on what the National Front is in France. Where fjordman fits in, I'm not so sure. I suppose you are saying he's a member of the National Front. Ok. He very well could be. Does that make him racist? and if he is a member, does that make the blog racist? What I asked for were excerpts from the blog that show racism, not even overtly, they can just elude to it, or be racist from your POV, but I would like to know which memes those are.

In addition, do you think we're at war with islamofascists? If not, why not? Anyone?
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 07:16 AM   #43 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
stevo: i vaporized an entire response, damn it...

1. the post on neofascism i put up i was making as i wrote it, so things are not in the best order (mea culpa)---the front national is kind of a template for understanding the rest of them--bt the last link (the bookrag link) is an actual comparative analysis across european neofascist organizations---so go there---i thought that the conclusions would be obvious from there regard mr. fjordman's politics.

i did not mean at all to imply that he was fn....

2. as for the "islamofascist" term, i'll simply quote back to you from dc dux's post on the previous page, which was initially debated in another direction:

Quote:
You dont defeat the extremists with policy and rhetoric that turns more moderate muslims to their side. At least Condi Rice recognized that:
In a controversial move within the administration, [Undersecretary of State Karen] Hughes and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice seem to have persuaded Bush ? temporarily, at least ? to drop the label ?Islamic fascism? from his speeches; diplomats say that Muslims hear it as an attack on their religion, thereby validating the extremists? false charge that the United States is at war with Islam.

The move is a blow to conservatives, who celebrated last month when President Bush used the term several times in his speeches on terrorism. The phrase is a favorite of right-wing commentators like Bill O?Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity; the AP called it ?the new buzzword? for conservatives ?in an election season dominated by an unpopular war in Iraq.?
it is a meaningless far right meme. meaningless in that it refers to nothing in the outside world--the term unifies where there is none--it gives an entirely illusory sense of there being a single Enemy--and uses inflammatory rhetoric to substitute for its emptiness.
like os many other far right memes, it is about selling the fraud that is the "war on terror" and the bush people along with it. so there may be such a war on "islamofascists", but it is in your head.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 10:44 AM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
I'm sorry rocah, but that doesn't do it for me. What I just read was a lesson on what the National Front is in France. <b>Where fjordman fits in, I'm not so sure.</b> I suppose you are saying he's a member of the National Front. Ok. He very well could be. Does that make him racist? and if he is a member, does that make the blog racist? What I asked for were excerpts from the blog that show racism, not even overtly, they can just elude to it, or be racist from your POV, but I would like to know which memes those are.

In addition, do you think we're at war with islamofascists? If not, why not? Anyone?
stevo, I tried to show in other posts, who is most enthusiastic about fjordman's writing. Consider who his message attracts. For example, I make it a rule to always take the opposite POV of a David Horowitz (FrontPageMag), or L. Brent Bozell III, and this strategy has served me well. Here is what "Bill" says about fjordman and his "message":
Quote:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=20646
Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
By Sharon Lapkin
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 27, 2005

Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
By Sharon Lapkin
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 27, 2005

In Australia, Norway, Sweden and other Western nations, there is a distinct race-based crime in motion being ignored by the diversity police: Islamic men are raping Western women for ethnic reasons. We know this because the rapists have openly declared their sectarian motivations.

When a number of teenage Australian girls were subjected to hours of sexual degradation during a spate of gang rapes in Sydney that occurred between 1998 and 2002, the perpetrators of these assaults framed their rationale in ethnic terms. The young victims were informed that they were “sluts” and “Aussie pigs” while they were being hunted down and abused.

In Australia's New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no, because they were not wearing a headscarf.

And earlier this year Australians were outraged when Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney where he informed his audience that rape victims had no one to blame but themselves. Women, he said, who wore skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them.

A few months earlier, in Copenhagen, Islamic mufti and scholar, Shahid Mehdi created uproar when – like his peer in Australia – he stated that women who did not wear a headscarf were asking to be raped.

And with haunting synchronicity in 2004, the London Telegraph reported that visiting Egyptian scholar Sheik Yusaf al-Qaradawi claimed female rape victims should be punished if they were dressed immodestly when they were raped. He added, “For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct.”

<b>In Norway and Sweden, journalist Fjordman warns of a rape epidemic.</b> Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen stated that the steady increase of rape-cases and the link to ethnicity are clear, unmistakable trends. Two out of three persecutions for rape in Oslo are immigrants with a non-Western background and 80 percent of the victims are Norwegian women.

In Sweden, according to translator for Jihad Watch, Ali Dashti, “Gang rapes, usually involving Muslim immigrant males and native Swedish girls, have become commonplace.” A few weeks ago she said, “Five Kurds brutally raped a 13-year-old Swedish girl.”

In France, Samira Bellil broke her silence – after enduring years of repeated gang rapes in one of the Muslim populated public housing projects – and wrote a book, In the hell of the tournantes, that shocked France. Describing how gang rape is rampant in the banlieues, she explained to Time that, “any neighborhood girl who smokes, uses makeup or wears attractive clothes is a whore.”

Unfortunately, Western women are not the only victims in this epidemic. In Indonesia, in 1998, human rights groups documented the testimony of over 100 Chinese women who were gang raped during the riots that preceded the fall of President Suharto. Many of them were told: “You must be raped, because you are Chinese and non-Muslim.”

Christian Solidarity Worldwide reported that in April 2005, a 9-year-old Pakistani girl was raped, beaten with a cricket bat, hanged upside down from the ceiling, had spoonfuls of chillies poured into her mouth, and repeatedly bashed while handcuffed. Her Muslim neighbours told her they were taking revenge for the American bombing of Iraqi children and informed her they were doing it because she was an “infidel and a Christian.”

In Sudan – where Arab Muslims slaughter black Muslim and Christian Sudanese in an ongoing genocide – former Sudanese slave and now a human rights’ activist Simon Deng says he witnessed girls and women being raped and that the Arab regime of Khartoum sends its soldiers to the field to rape and murder. In other reports, women who are captured by government forces are asked; “Are you Christian or Muslim?” and those who answer Christian, are gang raped before having their breasts cut off.

This phenomenon of Islamic sexual violence against women should be treated as the urgent, violent, repressive epidemic it is. Instead, journalists, academics, and politicians ignore it, rationalize it, or ostracize those who dare discuss it.

In Australia, when journalist Paul Sheehan reported honestly on the Sydney gang rapes, he was called a racist and accused of stirring up anti-Muslim hatred. And when he reported in his Sydney Morning Herald column that there was a high incidence of crime amongst Sydney’s Lebanese community, fellow journalist, David Marr sent him an e-mail stating, “That is a disgraceful column that reflects poorly on us all at the Herald.”

Keysar Trad, vice-president of the Australian Lebanese Muslim Association said the gang rapes were a “heinous” crime but complained it was “rather unfair” that the ethnicity of the rapists had been reported.

Journalist Miranda Devine reported during the same rape trials that all reference to ethnicity had been deleted from the victim impact statement because the prosecutors wanted to negotiate a plea bargain.

So when Judge Megan Latham declared, “There is no evidence before me of any racial element in the commission of these offences,” everyone believed her. And the court, the politicians and most of the press may as well have raped the girls again.

Retired Australian detective Tim Priest warned in 2004 that the Lebanese gangs, which emerged in Sydney in the 1990s – when the police were asleep – had morphed out of control. “The Lebanese groups,” he said, “ were ruthless, extremely violent, and they intimidated not only innocent witnesses, but even the police that attempted to arrest them.”

Priest describes how in 2001, in a Muslim dominated area of Sydney two policemen stopped a car containing three well-known Middle Eastern men to search for stolen property. As the police carried out their search they were physically threatened and the three men claimed they were going to track them down, kill them and then rape their girlfriends.

According to Priest, it didn’t end there. As the Sydney police called for backup the three men used their mobile phones to call their associates, and within minutes, 20 Middle Eastern men arrived on the scene. They punched and pushed the police and damaged state vehicles. The police retreated and the gang followed them to the police station where they intimidated staff, damaged property and held the police station hostage.

Eventually the gang left, the police licked their wounds, and not one of them took action against the Middle Eastern men. Priest claims, “In the minds of the local population, the police are cowards and the message was, 'Lebanese [Muslim gangs] rule the streets.'”

In France, in the banlieues, where gang rape is now known simply as tournantes or ‘pass-around,’ victims know the police will not protect them. If they complain, Samir Bellil said, they know that they and their families will be threatened.

However, Muslim women in the French ghettos are finally fighting back against gang rape and police non-action. They have begun a movement called, “We’re neither whores nor doormats.” They are struggling against the intrinsic violence that plagues their neighbourhoods and the culture that condones it.

In most French prosecutions, the Muslim rapists state that they do not believe they have committed a crime. And in a frightening parallel with the gang rapists in Australia, they claim the victim herself is to blame and accuse her of being a “slut” or a “whore.”

According to The Guardian, during the recent French riots, a Saudi Prince with shares in News Corporation boasted to a conference in Dubai that he had phoned Rupert Murdoch and complained about Fox News describing the disturbances as “Muslim riots.” Within half an hour he said, it was changed to “civil riots.”

Swedish translator, Ali Dashti, stated that in Sweden when three men raped a 22-year-old woman recently, they said one word to her. “Whore.” Such stories, according to Dashti, are in the Swedish newspapers every week. And, the politically correct “take great care not to mention the ethnic background of the perpetrators.”

Sweden’s English newspaper The Local reported in July that Malmo police commander Bengt Lindström had been charged with inciting racial hatred. He sent e-mails from his home computer to two city officials. To the head of healthcare, he wrote: “You...treat old Swedes who have worked hard building up the fatherland like parasites and would rather give my taxes to criminals called Mohammed from Rosengärd.”

In Malmo, the third largest city in Sweden, the police have admitted, Dashti says, that they no longer control the city. “It is effectively ruled by violent gangs of Muslim immigrants.” Ambulance personnel are regularly attacked and spat upon and are now refusing to help until a police escort arrives. The police are too afraid to enter parts of the city without backup.

In early 2005, Norwegian newspapers reported that Oslo had recorded the highest ever number of rape cases in the previous twelve months. However, Fjordman explained, the official statistics contained no data regarding “how immigrants were grossly over represented in rape cases”, and the media remain so strangely silent.

Oslo Professor of Anthropology, Unni Wikan, said Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, she stated, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.

The BBC pulled a documentary scheduled for screening in 2004, after police in Britain warned it could increase racial tension. “In these exceptional circumstances... Channel 4 as a responsible broadcaster has agreed to the police’s request...” The documentary was to show how Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abused young, white English girls as young as 11.

The number of rapes committed by Muslim men against women in the last decade is so incredibly high that it cannot be viewed as anything other than culturally implicit behaviour. It is overtly reinforced and sanctioned by Islamic religious leaders who blame the victims and excuse the rapists.

In three decades of immigration into Western countries, Islam has caused social upheaval and havoc in every one of its host countries. No other immigration program has encountered the problems of non-assimilation and religious ambiguity.

Everywhere in the world, Muslims are in conflict with their neighbours. And as Mark Steyn recently said, every conflict appears to have originated by someone with the name of Mohammed.

In July 2005, Melbourne Sheik Mohammad Omran told Sixty Minutes that “...we believe we have more rights than you because we choose Australia to be our home and you didn’t. “

In the same interview visiting Sheik Khalid Yasin warned “There’s no such thing as a Muslim having a non-Muslim friend, so a non-Muslim could be your associate but they can't be a friend. They're not your friend because they don't understand your religious principles and they cannot because they don't understand your faith.”

Despite being told over and over by Islamic scholars, and witnessing massive influxes of Islamic crime, Western countries continue to believe in the reality of assimilation and moral relativism.

In Australia, Lebanese Christians have assimilated and become a respected part of our community. The Premier of Victoria is a Lebanese Christian as is the Governor Of New South Wales. However, Lebanese Muslims have encountered serious problems because of their refusal to accept our right to live our way of life. Nothing so clearly demonstrates that it is not an issue of race — but of culture.
The preceding "article" os critiqued here:
http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/d...6-ce125d8e5dcd

Here is one of several posts by "Bill", he says in his post that follows this one that he is a longtime employee of the SF Chronicle:

Quote:
http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/d...1-ee34734c8b3a
Re: politics, media, ethnicity
Tue, December 27, 2005 - 11:17 PM
What do I think about this article. Let's see:

1) It enumerates numerous instances of hideous acts but fails to give a single citation that would allow the reader to backtrack and look at the original source that reported the "incident" or verify that it actually had occurred.

<b>2) It quotes "journalist Fjordman" without saying where his quote appeared, who he is or when and where any of the alleged incidents he claims as a "rape epidemic" occurred. In fact, "journalist Fjordman" is an European blogger whose site seems to consist mostly of second hand posts complaining about Muslims and the Middle East. Fjordman's blog, incidentally, has been quoted admiringly by no less an objective source than StormFront.org, the Neo Nazi organization that sports the slogan "White Pride World Wide."</b>

3) It offers several remarks that were allegedly made by Muslim clerics without giving the context in which these statements were made or any details that would allow one to determine whether they had been made at all.

And that is just for starters.

This "article" contains a string of highly tendentious statements purporting to show a reign of terror by Muslims against women, but fails to offer enough detail about any of them so that a person could actually verify they had occurred.

But to be fair, I did a little checking, which is certainly a lot more than the average lazy and gullible reader of FrontPage "magazine" is likely to do.

The first thing I found out is that one of the key sources for the article is a website called Faithfreedom.org, which equates all Islam with terrorism. In fact, the organization's website states, simply:

"Islamic terrorism is inspired by Islamic teachings. We can never get rid of Islamic terrorism unless we defeat the ideology behind it and that is Islam itself."

It also calls the Quran: "The source of hate, violence and Islamic terrorism."

Faithfreedom.org is about as dispassionate and objective a source of news about Islam and its adherents as Tom Metzger's White Aryan Resistance website is of dispassionate and objective news about blacks and Jews.

So then I turned to the author of the FrontPage article, Sharon Lapkin.

Well, it turns out that she is a former Australian Army Officer and a postgraduate student at the University of Melbourne. At least, that's according to her bio in FrontPage Magazine.

This incredibly terse bio -- which does not state what Lapkin's military specialty was, what rank she held, how long she served or where she was posted -- raises more questions than it answers.

I ran her name through the University of Melbourne's website and found out that Ms. Lapkin is in the English department at the University and wrote a piece on the UN's failures that was published in the Herald Sun newspaper in November of this year.

The Herald Sun is a Rupert Murdoch rag in Australia, for those who are not familiar. You remember Murdoch, don't you? He is the guy who brought you "fair and balanced news."

Although the University website doesn't mention it, Lapkin has also written an article in FrontPage that unflatteringly compared Australian aborigines to bomb-packing Palestinian terrorists -- primarily so she could spend most of the article beating up on the Palestinians. And not just the bomb-packing sort, either. All Palestinians in the occupied territories.

Judging from the surly tone and hyperbolic nature of the article, it is apparent that Ms. Lapkin has some "issues" with people of middle eastern descent.

Could it be that the mysterious Sharon Lapkin is related to Ted Lapkin, director of policy analysis for the Australia Israel and Jewish Affairs Council, which is also headquartered in Melbourne?

Possibly not, but the name and situs hookup is an interesting coincidence. Also the fact that AIJAC regularly rails against Islamic extremism. And that its leader and Ted Lapkin's boss, Colin Rubenstein, has had opinion pieces on the Middle East published in -- ta da! -- Rubert Murdoch's Herald Sun newspaper.

Whatever her background may be, Lapkin's piece is a very badly put together hatchet job that largely depends on unnamed sources and underidentified incidents.

The sources that are actually named in the piece are uniformly dubious:

* Tim Priest, a retired New South Wales police sergeant who has made a good second career for himself slogging the menace of ethnic criminal syndicates to his fellow Aussies and whipping up public hysteria about the alleged criminality of Australians of Middle Eastern heritage.

* "Translator Ali Dashti," who, it turns out, works for another anti-Muslim website, Dhimmi Watch, which was founded by Robert Spencer, an "expert" on Islam for the right-wing Free Congress Foundation.

* And Mark Steyn, the knuckle-dragging Canadian "humorist" who was described by The Boston Phoenix as "the most toxic right wing pundit you've never heard of."

Honestly, folks. This "article" is as loaded as a Saturday night special in the hands of a convenience store holdup artist.

If you believe anything it says, I can put you in touch with one of my Nigerian pen pals who has a bunch of money he would like you to help him get out of his country...
stevo, we've pointed you toward information and opinion that shows what "fjordman" is about, and who his message appeals to. Horowitz's approval of fjordman and the "message" is "telling". You've obviously bought into thinking that is, charitably described as "counterproductive". It's up to you to decide if you want to continue to embrace it, or not. I cannot stress enough that you should consider who your fellow "believers" are. IMO, they do not seem like folks who are all that trustworthy or accurate in what they say and do, and in their past agendas.
host is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:15 AM   #45 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
stevo, I tried to show in other posts, who is most enthusiastic about fjordman's writing. Consider who his message attracts. For example, I make it a rule to always take the opposite POV of a David Horowitz (FrontPageMag), or L. Brent Bozell III, and this strategy has served me well. Here is what "Bill" says about fjordman and his "message":

The preceding "article" os critiqued here:
http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/d...6-ce125d8e5dcd

Here is one of several posts by "Bill", he says in his post that follows this one that he is a longtime employee of the SF Chronicle:


stevo, we've pointed you toward information and opinion that shows what "fjordman" is about, and who his message appeals to. Horowitz's approval of fjordman and the "message" is "telling". You've obviously bought into thinking that is, charitably described as "counterproductive". It's up to you to decide if you want to continue to embrace it, or not. I cannot stress enough that you should consider who your fellow "believers" are. IMO, they do not seem like folks who are all that trustworthy or accurate in what they say and do, and in their past agendas.
Well, host, you haven't done a good enough job. So you're backtraking from "its a racist blog" to "his blog attracts racists." I think there's a big difference. I can see why racists would be attracted to his blog. It speaks ill of people who aren't white. Does that make the blog racist? Not in and of itself it doesn't.

I see you posted a news article about muslims raping australian women. Is that a racist newsarticle because it points out the ethnicity and/or religion of the rapists? Whats racist in disclosing the ethnicity and religion of a gang of rapists, especially if they justify their crimes with their religion?

Interestingly enough, you can find news articles all over the web that are reporting on the same problem: gangs of young muslim men attacking and raping western women and saying they've commited no crime because under sharia law they're allowed to because the women were not wearing a veil and were not escorted by a man while in public. Is that the kind of stuff you're trying to defend?

I still miss your point. Maybe I didn't, let me see if I get it:

1. We're not at war with islamofascists because there's no such thing as an islamofascist.

2. Fjordman's blog is racist because it attracts a racist crowd.

3. News stories specifying the race/ethnicity/religion of a rapist are a racist news stories.

4. There is no problem in australia, sweeden, denmark, or norway with gangs of muslim immigrants raping white girls and justifying it by sharia law.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 10-09-2006, 11:23 AM   #46 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
not to worry , stevo: i'll hold my nose and dive back into the foul air of mr, fjordman's stupid blog as soon as i have a chance. i would prefer to avoid it only because the air is really pretty dank there, but no matter, if you insist that you cannot see what is obvious, we will eviscerate the beast and drag out any number of parts and show you.

as for you 4 points above:

number 4: you cannot possibly be fucking serious repeating much less believing this particular piece of neonazi horseshit, can you? this is not at all far from the old blood libel idiocy that provided so much fictional grist for the mill of antisemitism. tell me you do not really believe that, or i will get the impression that i am wasting my time taking you at all seriously.

number 3: this would be what we call a nonsequitor in the biz.
you know, a non sequitor: the volkswagen is elephant.

2. fjordman's blog is racist because of its content.

1. there are "islamofacsists" in your imagination, corn fed by right media, but not in the world. you may well be at war with this imaginary enemy--when i was little, one my teddy bears was at war with another teddy bear. it is like that.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

Tags
fjordman, report

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360