10-23-2008, 01:14 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
Introducing Paranoia
Ok, McCain is trailing Obama by a large amount in initial polls. There is speculation that an attack or catastrophe may happen between now and Nov 4, or even between now and Jan 20th. This catastrophe would be used as a political tool to either swing the vote in McCain's direction by some spin, or to give justification to Pres Bush to retain power and give him authority past his lame duck period. It doesn't have to be a catastrophe, it could be something that completely tarnishes the reputation of Obama in order to swing the vote in the other direction - like an affair with Janet Jackson or an AIDS diagnosis.
If this were to happen, would you call shenanigans? Feeling as secure as you may be with the reality that you see before you, how convinced would you be that the fix was on if this reality was completely shifted in the coming weeks? I know I would feel directly manipulated. I would join the revolution.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
10-23-2008, 01:20 PM | #2 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
One way or the other, Bush will be out of power after January 20th. I'm not worried about that.
McCain I am concerned about, but I'm more concerned about vote tampering than a false flag or a red herring. It's been frighteningly successful in the past 2 elections. |
10-23-2008, 01:28 PM | #3 (permalink) |
lightform
Location: Edge of the deep green sea
|
"Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is it vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished, as the once vital voice of the verisimilitude now venerates what they once vilified. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction, and so it is my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V." |
10-23-2008, 01:30 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Baltimoron
Location: Beeeeeautiful Bel Air, MD
|
They already did the AIDS diagnosis plot line on House...
I think if it went to your second scenario (President Bush attempting to remain in power) it would fail anyway from a complete breakdown in the government and legal system (Congress would impeach, he would have to try and arrest the Congress and a Supreme Court that no matter the accusations and beliefs of detractors wouldn't continue with any party line that goes that far). As for the first, the question would have to be how you could know the legitimacy of what happens? And if it (being legitimate) causes people to switch their votes, then maybe they SHOULD be voting that way anyway if they are that worried, or just shouldn't be voting at all. I think this IS paranoia, but I will say that there is no excuse or explanation short of military invasion of the mainland United States by a sovereign nation for a breach of the Constitution like is being proposed, and I know as someone who voted once (twice had I been old enough) for Bush and likely will for McCain that I wouldn't stand for it.
__________________
"Final thought: I just rented Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine. Frankly, it was the worst sports movie I've ever seen." --Peter Schmuck, The (Baltimore) Sun |
10-23-2008, 02:36 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
I am not concerned about some potential catastrophe to occur that would sway voters....that "October surprise" came early this year with the economic meltdown..and that did turn the tide of the election.
What I am most concerned about is frustration, anger, resentment reaching levels that could get ugly if voters feel that they are being disenfranchised. By most projections, this election will have the highest voter turnout in years....approaching or exceeding 70% (which is extraordinary for the US...not so much in other countries) with millions of first time voters who dont know what to expect. And despited claims to the contrary, it is the Republican strategy to suppress as many voters as they can, particularly minority voters. They have already played the ACORN card. They are playing the "if your house was foreclosed, you cant vote" card in several battle ground states, etc. Next, they will have operatives all over the polls in swing states, looking over the shoulders of "selective" voters for the smallest ways to challenge a vote....things like challenging the right to vote if the voter registration ID does not "match" a state dvm list because the middle name was left out, and demanding that those voters use provisional ballots. Democratic operatives will be all over these polling places as well. A key component of the Obama strategy is trying to get as many voters as they can to vote before Nov 4 where permitted....and it working at unprecedented levels which should help alleviate the Republican suppression tactics. A story by RFK Jr. in Rolling Stone sums up the potential problems pretty well. Block the Vote : Rolling Stone Quote:
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-23-2008 at 02:48 PM.. |
|
10-23-2008, 03:27 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
warrior bodhisattva
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing? —Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön Humankind cannot bear very much reality. —From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot |
|
10-23-2008, 03:40 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Eponymous
Location: Central Central Florida
|
I'm feeling slightly paranoid, halx.
I thought it was just us Floridians that felt that way. Those last two elections were ours, ya know.
__________________
We are always more anxious to be distinguished for a talent which we do not possess, than to be praised for the fifteen which we do possess. Mark Twain |
10-23-2008, 03:44 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Nothing
|
The 'october surprise' was an is the financial crisis.
It has more than a few hands to be played yet.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}-- |
10-23-2008, 04:10 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
In all seriousness to the OP, I can imagine anything happening at this point. What's sad is none of these paranoid outcomes would actually suprise me due to how crazy things have been the last 8 years.
__________________
It's time for the president to hand over his nobel peace prize. Last edited by samcol; 10-23-2008 at 04:15 PM.. |
|
10-23-2008, 07:40 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Cottage Grove, Wisconsin
|
Exactly. McCain had a chance but all he did was attack Obama. I don't see how an attack would benefit McCain at this point. He's made himself look petty, indecisive, and impetuous, not to mention ill-informed. I think an attack would only amplify Obama's lead.
|
10-24-2008, 05:38 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Darth Papa
Location: Yonder
|
If the response to a hypothetical attack would be anything like the response to the economic crisis, Obama would be presidential and composed, McCain would try to blame Obama and veer all over the map, and Obama would gain another ten points in the polls.
This cat's in the bag. But we can't say that too loud because we actually NEED that 70% voter turnout. |
10-25-2008, 07:35 AM | #12 (permalink) |
immoral minority
Location: Back in Ohio
|
What I'm worried about is if some crazy racist takes a shot at Obama. The secret service better be on high alert and do a good job.
I don't think that anything else would cause too big of a problem to keep people from voting. |
10-25-2008, 01:48 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
But there were the court judgments in Ohio and Michigan that the voter caging practices by the state Republican parties was illegal. If you go back a few years, you have the conviction of a RNC official in NH and documented voting roll purges in OH and FL. And still there have been NO documented felonies committed by ACORN. But the US DOJ is still investigating whether its attorneys were used illegal for political purposes to pursue non-existent voter fraud cases with the underlying intent of suppressing minority voters....you may recall those who didnt go along with the Rove/Gonzales plan were fired in the US attorney scandal.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-25-2008 at 01:57 PM.. |
|
10-25-2008, 02:02 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Location: Washington DC
|
mcgredo...no, I think documented felony is pretty clear.
There have been none. Its not a felony to turn in questionable voter registrations to the state.` In fact the opposite is true....You do understand that ACORN or any voter advocacy organization is required by law to submit any voter registration form it receives (even Mickey Mouse). And ACORN separates the questionable registrations when it submits them. -----Added 25/10/2008 at 06 : 07 : 57----- Preventing people from voting because their house has been foreclosed (Repubican attempt in OH and MI) is the illegal practice.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-25-2008 at 02:07 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
10-25-2008, 02:34 PM | #17 (permalink) |
Crazy
|
Ummmmm...
BAM STAFFERS PULL THEIR BOGUS OHIO BALLOTS - New York Post And you're absolutely correct. ACORN canvassers are REQUIRED by law to turn in those bogus registrations that they have bribed people to fill out. |
10-25-2008, 02:40 PM | #18 (permalink) | |
Location: Washington DC
|
Quote:
On the "temp" staff of both campaigns in OH, the NY Post article mentions the Obama staff members who pulled their registrations because they were "temp" residents....after both campaigns were warned/ It doesnt mention the several out-of-state McCain staff "temp residents" who already voted in OH and several others with questionable registrations like the Obama "temps." -----Added 25/10/2008 at 06 : 59 : 20----- More from Ohio and Michigan: After the Republicans failed to force as many as 200,000 newly-registered voters in Ohio to cast provisional ballots (it was rejected last week by the US Supreme Court.)....the (Democratic) Ohio Secretary of State has received death threats and had the agency's website hacked. Ohio secretary of state's Web site hacked - CNN.com In Michigan, the two campaigns and national/state parties agreed to a settlement that will not allow foreclosure lists to be used to prevent residents from voting.....although the Repub party claimed that was never their intent. GOP vows not to use foreclosure lists at polls The biggest difference this year is that the Democrats are challenging potential Republican suppression tactics (like those in OH and MI) BEFORE the election rather than after the fact...they learned from their mistakes in 04.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good." ~ Voltaire Last edited by dc_dux; 10-25-2008 at 03:17 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
|
Tags |
introducing, paranoia |
Thread Tools | |
|
|