Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2009, 10:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Lobbyists to be Barred from Advisory Panels

washingtonpost.com

This is the first really strong initiative by Obama to curb the influence of K Street in Washington. Strangely, it's not getting much air time....
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 02:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Its a step in the right direction, but I don't know how effective it will be.
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]
Halx is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 08:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
I have to wonder how long this policy will last after Obama leaves office.
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 09:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 10:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
Earmarks are fine. Pork projects are not.
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Earmarks are THE way pork projects occur.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 05:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Water is the way drownings occur. Ban water!
ratbastid is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 06:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
It won't mean anything until earmarks are ended. They can sit out the advisory panels, but just strong-arm their pocketed congressman as it goes through the committees.
This has little or nothing to with earmarks.

The focus of these Executive branch advisory panels is primarily on recommendations for the regulations to implement programs AFTER legislation has been enacted.

Removing the direct lobbying influence in rule-making (writing regulations) is significant.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 08:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver View Post
Earmarks are THE way pork projects occur.
All pork projects are earmarks.

Not all earmarks are pork projects
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 06:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Only term limits will curb the influence of lobbyists.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
Only term limits will curb the influence of lobbyists.
or magnify them
Derwood is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 11:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
Earmarks are fine. Pork projects are not.
pork projects/earmarks are just like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. in other words, one mans bridge to nowhere is another mans necessary infrastructure rebuilding.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 07:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
pork projects/earmarks are just like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. in other words, one mans bridge to nowhere is another mans necessary infrastructure rebuilding.

a lot of it is pretty clear cut, though.
Derwood is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
a lot of it is pretty clear cut, though.
In my opinion, here's how it should work: The federal government has a budget for maintaining interstate commerce. This covers roads, airports, and shipping ports in the States. This money is divided amongst the states each year based on one of two ways:

1) Population (from census data)
2) Contribution to interstate commerce (perhaps the state's percentage of GDP)

Here's the kicker: "Do with it what you will, nothing more is coming." No earmarks, no pork. It is up to the state to prioritize what they do with their federal highway funds. You want a bridge to nowhere built? No, problem: use your highway funds. No special projects at all, period.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 07:01 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
In my opinion, here's how it should work: The federal government has a budget for maintaining interstate commerce. This covers roads, airports, and shipping ports in the States. This money is divided amongst the states each year based on one of two ways:

1) Population (from census data)
2) Contribution to interstate commerce (perhaps the state's percentage of GDP)

Here's the kicker: "Do with it what you will, nothing more is coming." No earmarks, no pork. It is up to the state to prioritize what they do with their federal highway funds. You want a bridge to nowhere built? No, problem: use your highway funds. No special projects at all, period.
All of this...and the earmark/pork talk...have little or nothing to do with the new policy to bar lobbyists from federal advisory boards and councils, the impact of which is significant on the development of federal regulations (not legislation).

It would have been better to have it issued as an Executive Order, carrying the force of law (and requiring future presidents to formally rescind it through another EO) rather than through a Presidential Memorandum...but it is a big step to minimizing the impact of lobbyists.

---------- Post added at 10:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------

But.....if the interest is continuing with the earmark/pork discussion.....most of those have less to do with the influence of lobbyists and more to do with responding to constituents by funding projects in the home state/districts....some certainly worthy of federal funding and others not so much.

I dont think the lobbyists for the road builders association or the civil engineers association had much to do with the bridge to nowhere.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 12-01-2009 at 07:07 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

Tags
advisory, barred, lobbyists, panels


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73