Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-11-2010, 08:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
Bipartisan Deficit Panel Recommendations

Obama appointed a bipartisan deficit panel to make recommendations for how to lower the deficit to 3% of GDP. They have completed a draft which has been released and it is a mix of across the board spending cuts including entitlements and defense and broad changes to the tax code (tax increases). It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I think we're screwed. People want to cut the deficit but nobody wants to make a sacrifice.

Deficit Panel's Leaders Push Cuts - WSJ.com

Quote:
WASHINGTON—The leaders of a White House commission laid out a sweeping proposal to cut the federal budget deficit by hundreds of billions a year by targeting sacrosanct areas of U.S. tax and spending policy, such as Social Security benefits, middle-class tax breaks and defense spending.

The preliminary plan in its current form would end or cap a wide range of breaks relied on by the middle class—including the deduction for home-mortgage interest. It would tax capital gains and dividends at the higher rates now levied on wage income. To compensate, one version of the plan would dramatically lower and simplify individual rates, to 9%, 15% and 24%.

For businesses, the controversial plan would significantly lower the corporate tax rate—from a current top rate of 35% to as low as 26%—but also eliminate a number of deductions. It would make permanent the research and development tax credit.

Overall, the plan would hold down the growth of the federal debt by roughly $3.8 trillion by 2020, or about half of the $7.7 trillion by which the debt would have otherwise grown by that year, according to commission staff. The current national debt is about $13.7 trillion.

The budget deficit, or the amount by which federal expenditures exceed revenues each year, was about $1.3 trillion for fiscal year 2010, which ended on Sept. 30.

The interim report by the panel's co-chairmen stands as an opening bid in what will likely be a heated debate over the future of spending and taxes, issues that exploded in the midterm elections. Many of the plan's more provocative elements are intended as starting points for negotiation, not final recommendations.
kutulu is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 05:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I'm going to look into this and read it this weekend. But, I think we need to do everything. Eliminate all the tax cuts, lower SS payments, means test some benefits, reduce the costs per student in schools, reduce medical payments by getting healthier, cut 25% of the military (close bases, bring troops back,...) etc...

It is just like losing weight. A person can stay the same weight by doing a little, but to change your weight you need to do more. Our debt is obese and just doing a little will only keep it around 14 trillion.

I just wonder (and China is too) if we are devaluing our currency in order to pay off the debt. (I'll make a new thread about this tomorrow).
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 07:36 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003 View Post
I'm going to look into this and read it this weekend. But, I think we need to do everything. Eliminate all the tax cuts, lower SS payments, means test some benefits, reduce the costs per student in schools, reduce medical payments by getting healthier, cut 25% of the military (close bases, bring troops back,...) etc...

It is just like losing weight. A person can stay the same weight by doing a little, but to change your weight you need to do more. Our debt is obese and just doing a little will only keep it around 14 trillion.

I just wonder (and China is too) if we are devaluing our currency in order to pay off the debt. (I'll make a new thread about this tomorrow).
I'm a little confused about how lowering SS payments will help close the budget gap and/or lower the deficit. Isn't the revenue for SS generated by it's own tax with the excess revenues going into the SS trust? If that's the case it's entirely separate from the spending problem and all you are going to do is increase the size of the trust.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 09:44 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junkie
 
The SS changes are only for keeping social security solvent and don't affect the overall budget.

Once concern I have is if they get rid of the mortgage deduction what happens to families that have a mortgage and are counting on that deduction to pay their mortgage? Do we begin another round of foreclosures?
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-12-2010, 12:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
After looking into it appears the mortgage deduction would only be discontinued for second homes and the mortgages above $500,000. That doesn't seem so bad as it is clear that people that have two homes or homes worth that much can likely afford it.
Rekna is offline  
Old 11-14-2010, 08:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
I think it is only fair that everyone should have to pay more taxes in order to get things straightened out. I also agree with cutting entitlement benefits but I think the cuts should start now, not decades from now. The baby boomers got us into this mess, they can make a sacrifice to help get us out of it.
kutulu is offline  
Old 11-16-2010, 08:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
I find it hilarious that all the talk of cutting spending is focused on cutting spending for entitlements to the people, but these government schmucks are avoiding cutting their own budgets like it was the plague.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

Tags
bipartisan, deficit, panel, recommendations

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360