Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-01-2011, 12:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
New Perspective - the need to go beyond old political paradigms

This story, from the LA Times, got me thinking of the need for new ways to grasp what the world needs now:

Brazil president: New president of Brazil sworn in - latimes.com

The gist of it revolves around the background and context of the new President of Brazil:

"Dilma Rousseff is Brazil's first female president, taking over from the immensely popular Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The new president hopes to keep the country's booming economy on track while advancing her Workers Party social agenda."

As I completed reading the piece, I had thoughts very similar to those of the commenter below. I was pleased to see them so well stated. Here's the comment:

"dbtkgrace at 10:46 AM January 01, 2011
The newly elected president who was a former Marxist is not a reflection on Brazil but a profound reflection on how backward a country US has become as the Right will denounce the election as a step toward communism and dictatorship.

The right appears unable to grasp the situation that the only military might in the world is us. The only country who has the might and the dangerous support from mostly the Republican side to invade any country in the world at any cost to the people of their own.

To put things in perspective, the tragedy of 9/11 horrible as it may seem, was just a slap in the face by an ignorant little group of thugs who in order to gain the most attention "bothers" the biggest guy in the neighborhood.....perspectively speaking in historical war atrocity terms of course. And indeed in order to get out of the mess we're in in the Middle East, we have to accept the 9/11 in historical context. Otherwise, we'll continue to live in fear and put our own citizens in dire economic conditions that we find ourselves in.

Brazil an economically troubled country "not so long ago" decides to elect a former Marxist as a president. I don't think this happens if the people of Brazil were fearful as we are of the past as we continue to be. Living in fear in the US. Not the US that I imagined in year 2011."

*

It's true. We must begin to embrace new paradigms that are able to come to terms with the fact that the world from which we are emerging is not the world we are living in, and it is not the world of the future.

*

For me, it is all about compassion. I need to see a politics and an economics of empathy and compassion supplant the old hyper-competitive notions that got us here.

How do you see the new world order shaping up? Are you able to get beyond the old labels to see global realities in new, more constructive ways?
__________________
create evolution

Last edited by ARTelevision; 01-01-2011 at 01:02 PM..
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 01-02-2011, 08:34 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
interesting. this seems to me a kind of meta-question that requires moving back a few steps from the run-of-the-mill politics discussions. for what it's worth, it gets to some of what i actually think about (as over against the chess playing that happens in the forum and in discussions like these)...

ideologically, left/right: it's all over. the politics of nation-states, of forms of capitalism that coincide with nation-states. in the states, the level of ideological control is a basic problem--people in the main haven't caught up with this most basic of problems and because that's the case, it seems to me, the dominant language of politics here is out of phase with the realities it is supposed to frame. politically, the united states is passing through a phase that's like a privatized late stalinism.

sometimes i think that neo-liberal marketeer ideology was structured by a sense that it was heading toward a wall, and being an identity-based form enables those who invest in the world through it to not see an ideology heading for a Problem, but only the end of everything. so plunder while you can get it; soon the pickings won't be so good.

there are consequences to intellectual paralysis and i expect that they'll reveal themselves even more than they alreay have in due course.

but to get to the more interesting stuff...

it seems to me that folk are stumbling their way into some new things at different levels of activity, in terms of thinking about the world and connecting that to ways of considering social organization and/or questions.

a lot of folk seem to have moved into one or another form of conceptual art practice as a way to explore new ways to put media into motion, to generate phenomena rather than represent them. in my little corner of this world, i like to talk about triggering stories rather than telling them.

it seems that this direction opens onto possibilities for thinking about emergence and collapse as a fundamental dynamic in the bio-world...which lets you move away from subject-object relations and the whole representational schtick that's been built on that assumption and into other spaces. the problem with those other spaces, i think anyway, is that they're elusive. difficult to express. a lot of newer work, even in static media, are closer to conceptual art than anything else because the reader/viewer has to stage the piece, which is often like a set of directions or parameters/boundaries---so the representation is collapsed onto the sentences themselves which are understood to combine with a reader's experiences in order to generate a situation or scene---the words are stripped out, abstracted so that what is generated is particular to the imagination of each person, but is nonetheless transcendent to the extent that the constraints give particular repeatable characteristics to each experience (without that, one story is any story and no story at all...there has to be a better way to say this).

another problem is that this whole set of relations uses (in the case of writing anyway) conventional grammar to get sentences based on it to do things that the grammar isn't usually called upon to do. it's like an extension of the adage "show don't tell."

this at the level of individual pieces and the process of making them, i think---there's already a problem of saying what it is that the pieces are doing. so there's a problem with the registers of emergence that repeats it.

how one goes from these sorts of exploration to political statements is not obvious. but it's interesting.

at the social level, it's pretty clear (to me anyway) that a politics of compassion is also a politics of scale. in the various cultural spaces that address questions of food production and it's ethics, this is already pretty well articulated. and it think it's an interesting place to start from, one that could address the underlying tension created by this "globalizing capitalism"/universal neo-colonialism thing we live with these days.

still thinking.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 01-02-2011, 10:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Yes, that's in the spirit of my post, thanks, rb. From the ways in which we categorize knowledge (see Morin's, On Complexity) to the ways in which we frame experience, we're evolving novel paradigms, ineluctably...I suppose, because the old ones are failing daily.

And, as my own contributions are aesthetic ones, for me this is an essentially creative process - as you indicate above (nice words on art, btw), it's a politics as art/art as politics question, as well.

This discussion might also function well in the Philosophy Forum...but, again, our categorizations are an essential part of the problem.

So yes, matters of the heart - empathy and compassion. Either we come to these as the purpose and meaning of our existence or we lose our humanity and everything else in the process - for we have demonstrated the capacity to destroy everything along with ourselves...

New labels, then...new paradigms...new ways of thinking. Let's get to it. This is the time. What are you doing to create the new world view?
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 07:58 AM   #4 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I've been thinking about this off and on for a bit. The issue, I think, is that we've moved from a past filled with imperialism, conquest, and opposition and into a period of interconnectedness and co-dependence. Where once it was the norm to be destructive, oppressive, and competitive, it is now becoming important to be generative, cooperative, and compassionate on a global scale.

The best way to "fight" things these days is not through military might or political wrangling or sanctions, or what have you. The best way to "fight" things is by being supportive of societies and their cultures. While this isn't universally so on the ideological level (i.e. it doesn't help to support oppressive regimes), it generally is on the social level (e.g. we solve the problem of poverty by supporting women economically and educationally).

Alleviating or eradicating social problems on a global scale has global benefits. You address the issue of terrorism and new forms of fascism by reducing the appeal. How do we bring young men into the fold of social integration and economic stability and out of the clutches of terrorist recruitment? That is the question, and only one of many.

There is too much to think about regarding this topic. It's broad. But those are my initial thoughts. I should explore some of the specifics more.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 04:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I wonder if Marxist or far left-wing socialist economic policies would work without a military competitor or war. Add in having a democratic elections (within supporters of the same left-wing theories), freedom of religion (but separate from the state), and freedom to move around the state, and I think it would be a very effective, healthy, and happy country.
ASU2003 is offline  
 

Tags
paradigms, perspective, political

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360