Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2011, 12:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Union-busting in Wisconsin turns volitile

Union protests.
Absentee Democrats.
Police dragnets.

One volatile vote.

A bill is about to be passed to—among other things—ban collective bargaining for public workers in Wisconsin.

Help me out here. First, I'm a bit shocked at the hostility against unions in the U.S. I know there is a long history, but, in this day and age, it seems extreme to hobble a public worker's union like this.

Second, Democrats are a no-show. This stalls the vote. Police are searching for them. How does this work? What are the legal ramifications of this? What will happen?

What do you think of the current status of unions in the U.S. in general?

Quote:
Police Search for Senate Democrats Who Skipped Vote to Curtail Union Rights in Wisconsin

Senate Democrats in Wisconsin failed to show up Thursday for a vote on a "union-busting" bill that has prompted police officers to launch a dragnet for the missing lawmakers.

Republicans hold a 19-14 majority but a vote cannot be taken until at least one Democratic senator is present.

"It's kind of unbelievable that they're elected to do a job and they wouldn't show up to do it," Republican Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald told Fox News.

Fitzgerald said the apparent boycott may force the State Assembly to vote first on the bill. But he added that if police officers find the lawmakers, they will bring them back to the chamber for a vote.

"This isn't something I've ever seen in the state of Wisconsin," he said. "It's a very volatile situation right now but those people were elected to do a job and unfortunately they're not doing it. They're not representing the people of their district."

The bill has sparked a storm of protest for three days. Teachers marching at Wisconsin's Capitol Building in Madison shut down schools for a second day Thursday so they could demand collective bargaining rights that they say are essential to keeping kids in school.

Dozens of schools closed as a result of high absences as thousands of protesters, including students and teachers, marched on the Capitol building to demand state lawmakers strike down a bill that would require union concessions worth $30 million by July 1 and $300 million over the next two years.

The bill, which also bans collective bargaining rights for teachers, requires educators to contribute 5.8 percent to their pensions and 12.6 percent to their health care. Currently, educators pay 0.2 percent for their pensions and 4 to 6 percent of their health care costs.

"Our goal is not to close schools, but to instead to remain vigilant in our efforts to be heard," said Mary Bell, president of the 98,000-strong Wisconsin Education Association Council.

State lawmakers proposed the legislation as part of an effort to close a $3.6 billion budget gap, and say they expect it to pass and eventually reach the desk of newly elected Republican Gov. Scott Walker.

"This bill isn't about an assault on public employees. We have great public employees throughout the state, I have them in my district, hard-working folks," said Republican state Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald. "What this is is about the budget. We're $3.6 billion in the hole. We're not going to raise taxes to solve it. We all ran, you know, this last election cycle on saying that we are going to cut government spending. ... Everybody is going to have to do their part."

But Michael Langyel, head of the Milwaukee Teachers Education Association, said Walker and Republican lawmakers are asking public employees to give up more than everyone else.

"If people say the only way to solve this budget crisis is to take away from people who are working hard, they are wrong. We believe that we have a right to have a fair wage for our hard work. More importantly, the collective bargaining process allows us to positively impact school policy issues. We are the advocates for our students, and we will maintain our voice in defending our students," he told Fox News.

Langyel added that if Walker wants to balance the budget, he should force his friends to pay more.

"There are many people who support the governor who contribute nothing and pay nothing and are not contributing. This is the time to have fair taxation in the state of Wisconsin, where the friends of the governors do not get a free ride and the hard-working people have to carry the extra burden," he said.

Speaking Wednesday to WTMJ4 in Milwaukee, President Obama weighed into the debate, saying that making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain "seems like more of an assault on unions."

"I think it is very important for us to understand that public employees, they're our neighbors, they're our friends," he said. "These are folks who are teachers and they're firefighters and they're social workers and they're police officers."

It is important "not to vilify them or to suggest that somehow all these budget problems are due to public employees," Obama said.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan told Fox News on Thursday that he is "troubled by the current climate" but was hopeful for a good resolution. He added that everyone is going to have to compromise even as teachers perform "Herculean" work.

"We have to work together with them to give every child a chance for a great education and we need to work together and we need to prove outside the comfort zone but to vilify one group or demonize one group doesn't move us as a country that we need to go," Duncan said.

But Walker said the demands on public employees are "modest" compared with those in the private sector, and are meant to prevent a shutdown, which could result in 6,000 state workers not getting paid.

"We're at a point of crisis," the governor said, adding that he would call out the National Guard if needed to keep state operations, including prisons, running.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2008, the average salary for an elementary school teacher was $51, 240 while middle school educators earned $50,950 and high school teachers earned $49, 400.

Wisconsin's measure would end collective bargaining for state, county and local workers, except for police, firefighters and the state patrol. Unions still could represent workers, but could not seek pay increases above those pegged to the Consumer Price Index unless approved by a public referendum. Unions also could not force employees to pay dues and would have to hold annual votes to stay organized.

Republican-backed changes to the bill made by the state's Senate budget committee Wednesday would extend a grievance procedure to public workers who don't have one and require more oversight and put a deadline on changes.

Fitzgerald said despite the heated debate, and individual threats against lawmakers, the majority of Wisconsin residents approve of the bill.

"Although the protesters have been very rowdy, very one sided on what legislators are hearing, there's a silent majority out there that spoke on November 2, said, you know, we have to (head the state) in the right direction to put our fiscal house in order. So that's what we're going to do. It's very difficult but you know that's what we're set out to do and hopefully."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read more: Police Search for Senate Democrats Who Skipped Vote to Curtail Union Rights in Wisconsin - FoxNews.com
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-17-2011, 12:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
This is a blatant attack on unions, which means an attack on workers' rights. It's entirely unacceptable. I keep trying to tell myself that it's not yet reached a point where a workers' revolution is necessary in the United States, but situations like this are starting to make me wonder if I'm just making excuses.

I think the time is fast approaching where a national strike will be necessary to wrangle power away from the corporate right and restore a balance of power. Unions cannot be allowed to die off.
Willravel is offline  
Old 02-17-2011, 12:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
it's amazing the level of historical blindness that's been descended upon the land here in reactionary valley regarding unions. it's like people who sell their labor power for a wage have been convinced that being utterly powerless is the natural order of things, that it's bad to organize. collective bargaining---and a strongly unionized workforce---was the motor that allowed for the transformation in consumer banking that enabled access to mortgages for working people, then other debt-generating instruments.

because it guaranteed steadily rising wages. so people could acquire debt and have some hope of fucking paying it without being reduced to debt peonage.

the news-speak of the neo-liberal set...the various idiotic propositions concerning unions repeated ad nauseum by the corporate "yay capitalism" press since the reagan period...the lack of historical memory....ach.

the is an instance of class warfare american-style.

it's like the place has regressed to some pre-1848 notion of capitalism.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 02-17-2011, 01:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
*They aren't going to raise taxes, except for the the public workers. Is what they should have said. (Although I think they should be paying more into the pension fund if they are going to get a lot back out.) Or will teacher salaries just increase 5%, so they will be able to 'choose' which 401k to invest in...

Scratch Wisconsin off the list of places I would want to live. And yes, the history of Unions is distorted, but I enjoy not living in a caste like society like India or being a wage salve in China. I'm not sure if the GOP/tea party wouldn't enjoy transforming America into that type of society, either knowingly, or as a survival of the fittest type of thing.

I just wish people saved a lot more money, so they could say screw this job, have fun finding hundreds of people and training them in the next week.

Last edited by ASU2003; 02-17-2011 at 01:10 PM..
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 02-17-2011, 01:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Craven Morehead's Avatar
 
I had a conversation with someone whose office is across the street from the Statehouse this morning. He put the blame on years and years of poor financial management by the legislature. Told me that the newly elected governor and legislature ran on this platform last fall. He believes the public supports the actions being taken by the governor.

Here's an interesting perspective Unions want to overturn election result - JSOnline
Craven Morehead is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 05:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
i can understand that people want to protect workers rights and all that, but why should we let the unions override good economic sense and control the state budgets?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 05:57 AM   #7 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
I can't help but find it a little ridiculous that the 'Republican Assembly Speaker' is accusing democratic lawmakers of not representing their constituents by not showing up for a lost cause vote that, obviously, most of their constituents would not support. I commend that collective action. It's refreshing to see democrats united and uncompromising, even if its only for a day.

Personally, I'm sick of thinking the word 'reprehensible.' This country is losing its collective mind. Honestly, I didn't foresee the level of crazy that would start taking over once Obama was elected. Instead of the country becoming more moderate, the political climate has become exponentially more alarming.

That's really all I have to say. News on the state level has been sickening since the new terms began in January, not the least of which here in Florida. I hate to think things like 'Americans are so stupid,' but I need someone to throw me a bone here. How can the devaluation of education, good health, clean environments and what is becoming the society with the widest income disparity in the first world ever be quantified as 'smart politics'? The problem with Americans is that they have no fucking appreciation for the future. They want what they want and the only good time for it is now, now, NOW!

Sorry to be all rant-y rave-y, but every day I give more serious consideration to packing up and abandoning this country once I am done with school. Why should I contribute my skills and hard work to a society that shares none of my values?

/end. sorry.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 06:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Fotzlid's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Boston area
Quote:
....Teachers marching... Dozens of schools closed as a result of high absences .....bans collective bargaining rights for teachers....head of the Milwaukee Teachers Education Association, said Walker and Republican lawmakers are asking public employees to give up more than everyone else.....even as teachers perform "Herculean" work .....give every child a chance for a great education
Who wrote this article, a journalist or a hack for the teacher's union?
Fotzlid is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 07:01 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Union protests.
Absentee Democrats.
Police dragnets.

One volatile vote.

A bill is about to be passed to—among other things—ban collective bargaining for public workers in Wisconsin.

Help me out here. First, I'm a bit shocked at the hostility against unions in the U.S. I know there is a long history, but, in this day and age, it seems extreme to hobble a public worker's union like this.

Second, Democrats are a no-show. This stalls the vote. Police are searching for them. How does this work? What are the legal ramifications of this? What will happen?

What do you think of the current status of unions in the U.S. in general?
What I gather from reading the articles is that the citizens of Wisconsin are fed up with government spending and voted in a governor and legislature that are about to cut spending. If that's what the voters wanted, then that is exactly what the government should do. Unions and their response of 'just raise taxes' is unacceptable.

It's about time somebody is willing to run government more like a business where you have to live within your budget.

I also read that so many teachers called in sick in some cities that schools were closed, resulting in essence in a strike, where that strike is illegal. Why aren't those teachers fined, jailed, or fired for participating in an illegal strike?

Unions are in decline in the US. Latest figures I saw for private sector were somewhere around 8% of the workforce and slightly higher for government.

Thanks to the union's history of violence, intimidation, fraud and some unions involvement with the Mafia, they deserve every bit of flack they get.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 08:08 AM   #10 (permalink)
Condensing fact from the vapor of nuance.
 
Anxst's Avatar
 
Location: Madison, WI
I hadn't posted here because I've been down at the capitol marching for the last few days, when I wasn't at work or school.

The majority of teachers I've spoken too understand that the budget is a mess, and that concessions have to be made. They're generally willing to make those concessions.

They're not willing to give up the right to bargain for those concessions, instead of just being handed whatever their employer likes.

The bill in question removes the public workers unions right to negotiate collectively for anything other than wages, and wage bargaining is only allowed to within a certain price index set by a third party (I do not recall what the index is off the top of my head) unless allowed to do so by a public vote.

It also removes the unions ability to require members to pay their union dues, and makes it so all union members have to vote to keep the union in force yearly. If the union doesn't get a majority vote, it's dissolved.

That sounds like union busting to me, pure and simple.

I may be entirely wrong, but it seems to me this is a straight ploy by the republicans in this state to remove the democratic power base.

The republicans are funded, for the most part, by corporate business. They are the business party, in simple terms.

The democrats are funded by the unions. They're the worker's party (again, in very simple terms).

How this is part of a budget repair bill, I do not understand. While the budget may be in disarray, it's not caused by what we're paying our teachers, nurses, firefighters, and police. (BTW, the firefighters and police unions are exempt from all of the above in the bill.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://joshhealey.org/2011/02/17/class-warfare-in-wisconsin/
1. The deficit is a made-up crisis.
Like most states, Wisconsin is struggling in the recession, but the state government isn’t actually broke. The state legislature’s fiscal bureau estimated the state would end the year with a $121 million balance. Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — but it is not because of an increase in worker wages or benefits. According to the Capital Times, it is because “Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for corporate and special-interest groups in January.” Nice. A man-made “crisis” as an excuse to push neoliberal cutbacks: Shock Doctrine, anyone?
I don't agree with the tone of the above, but his point is a sound one. Legislative mismanagement is the issue here. Doing this to our public servants won't fix it.

So, I march. I may head back there again today.
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm just releasing the insanity pressure from my headvalves.
Anxst is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 10:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
i can understand that people want to protect workers rights and all that, but why should we let the unions override good economic sense and control the state budgets?
I guess libertarianism goes out the window when the law is to prohibit unions from doing something, huh?


Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
Thanks to the union's history of violence, intimidation, fraud and some unions involvement with the Mafia, they deserve every bit of flack they get.
The "unions'" history of violence? Talk about re-writing history.
dippin is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
It's about time somebody is willing to run government more like a business where you have to live within your budget.
Sorry to pick out one quote, but I find that the attitude expressed here is pervasive amongst some folks. I just want to point out that businesses frequently spend more than they take in, and that when they find that they need more income, they frequently raise their prices.

If the government were to truly start running like a business, we'd be taxed even more and see even less benefit because this would be the most direct way for a government to maximize its profits, which is what it would be attempting to do if it were running like a business.

It's ridiculous to expect the government to behave like a business- the two organizations serve different purposes.
filtherton is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Sorry to pick out one quote, but I find that the attitude expressed here is pervasive amongst some folks. I just want to point out that businesses frequently spend more than they take in, and that when they find that they need more income, they frequently raise their prices.
say what? do you run or own a business?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 11:49 AM   #14 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
say what? do you run or own a business?
Do you?

How many years did it take for Amazon to turn a profit? Has twitter started making money yet?

Want to know what my cell phone company does when they want more money? They raise their prices. So does my gas company.
filtherton is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 12:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Do you?
yes, I have. and my experience tells me that if i'm losing money, raising prices is not going to cover it. one has to cut their expenses so that you're not spending more than you take in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
How many years did it take for Amazon to turn a profit? Has twitter started making money yet?
I don't follow them, but i'm sure that they had quite a bit of capital cash from investors to follow through on their model.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Want to know what my cell phone company does when they want more money? They raise their prices. So does my gas company.
want to know what happens to my cell phone and gas company when they raise prices higher than their competitors? they lose customers. then they lay people off. Its what they call reducing your expenditures.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 12:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
yes, I have. and my experience tells me that if i'm losing money, raising prices is not going to cover it. one has to cut their expenses so that you're not spending more than you take in.
So? No business can spend more than it brings in. Aside from semantic issues, the real question here is whether accumulating debt is an acceptable way of bringing in money.

Quote:
I don't follow them, but i'm sure that they had quite a bit of capital cash from investors to follow through on their model.
You don't think they accumulated any debt?

Quote:
want to know what happens to my cell phone and gas company when they raise prices higher than their competitors? they lose customers. then they lay people off. Its what they call reducing your expenditures.
That's weird, my cell phone company just tacked on an extra $10 dollars to their data plans and it hasn't seemed to get in the way of their profit (as far as I can tell).

Really, though, my point in this threadjack was that businesses frequently utilize debt when it benefits them to do so. Our government is no different. Further, businesses are motivated by profit, and it would be massively stupid for us to motivate our government officials using profit.

Last edited by filtherton; 02-18-2011 at 12:58 PM..
filtherton is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:00 PM   #17 (permalink)
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
filth-

Wisconsin has a constitutional amendment preventing unbalanced budgets. I believe that is why your suggestion of borrowing to cover the shortfall is not possible.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
So? No business can spend more than it brings in. Aside from semantic issues, the real question here is whether accumulating debt is an acceptable way of bringing in money.
there's no semantics here, wherever that came from. bottom line, if a business outspends itself, it goes out of business. as i stated earlier, if it's a publicly owned business on the stock market, there might be tons of capital cash available to maintain operations while a business alters their model, but a mom and pop business that raises prices to make up for lost revenue is only going to succeed as long as there's no competition and there is demand for their product.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
You don't think they accumulated any debt?
again, didn't follow them. but being big companies, i'm sure that, like other big companies, the amount of assets they had allowed them to get appropriate loans, up to a point. the governments of 46 states are very close to that point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
That's weird, my cell phone company just tacked on an extra $10 dollars to their data plans and it hasn't seemed to get in the way of their profit (as far as I can tell).
because you, and many others, didn't seem to mind paying that extra fee. if that fee caused thousands of their customers to move to another service, i'll bet that fee gets removed very quickly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Really, though, my point in this threadjack was that businesses frequently utilize debt when it benefits them to do so. Our government is no different. Further, businesses are motivated by profit, and it would be massively stupid for us to motivate our government officials using profit.
yes, those business' utilize their debt because they have the assets to do so through loans. our government has been doing that also and for far too long. it's catching up to them now and at a very bad time when the majority of the population demands no more raising taxes, but cutting spending.

as to governments using a profit model, i'm with you. governments of any sort in this nation are not constitutionally authorized to operate on a profit scale. they don't produce anything, they just consume.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:13 PM   #19 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414 View Post
filth-

Wisconsin has a constitutional amendment preventing unbalanced budgets. I believe that is why your suggestion of borrowing to cover the shortfall is not possible.
They should take a lesson from Minnesota and use complicated accounting tricks to pass the deficit a few years down the road *cough* Pawlenty *cough*.

Word on the street is that WI had a surplus until the current Gov came into office and started working his magic.

dk, all I'm saying is that if an organization with the motivations of a business was suddenly placed in a situation where it had all the power of the government, the situation would end very badly and debt would be the least of our problems (and would likely remain a problem given the capacity of the government to accumulate debt without consequence).

I understand the sentiment behind the idea that the government should be run like a business, however, I think it's an idea that falls apart when subject to any amount of scrutiny.

Last edited by filtherton; 02-18-2011 at 01:18 PM..
filtherton is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 01:17 PM   #20 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
This situation isn't complicated. Wisconsin's small budget problems were in no way caused by unions, but rather in large part to Special Session Senate Bill 2, which gives preferential tax breaks for health savings accounts, and Assembly Bill 7, which is a tax break for small businesses. These pieces of state legislation turned a state surplus into $120m deficit. Just like every other Republican in the past generation, this is about spending money without increasing taxes and then cutting workers' rights in the name of fiscal responsibility. Wisconsin Republicans are using this opportunity to achieve an ideological objective.

Last edited by Willravel; 02-18-2011 at 02:12 PM.. Reason: UNACCEPTABLE grammar mistake
Willravel is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:34 PM   #21 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: Alaska
Part of the ongoing Republican Crime Organization at work. I have watched this developing all my working life. This is not some accident of fate happening here. This is another step in a long range plan to destroy every last vestige of unionism in America. Once you take that step back and look at it from that perspective a lot of things make sense. Unfortunately many people believe that unions are the enemy. It is not unions destroying the American economy it is Republican policy makers that work for the richest ones who create the most opportunities for themselves to have more power and to consolidate more and more of the wealth. What is happening now is the inevitable result of policy decisions that have been taking place steadily over the last 30 some years. No big surprise at all. The gaining of wealth has no conscience. When the people themselves remove the obstacles to their own financial destruction that shows me all the proof I need that the Republican Crime Organization will succeed. The historical facts that somehow get overlooked is the real results of this kind of out of control profiteering
are sad to the extreme. The results are: civil war, poverty, exploitation of all kinds, and ultimately we will have dictatorship. Thanks a lot Republicans.
gooder is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:41 PM   #22 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton View Post
Sorry to pick out one quote, but I find that the attitude expressed here is pervasive amongst some folks. I just want to point out that businesses frequently spend more than they take in, and that when they find that they need more income, they frequently raise their prices..
And when business raise their prices to the point where they are not competitive, customers go elsewhere unless there's compelling reasons to keep doing business with the company.

I'm tech lead on a small team in the company I work for. My company is profitable. I have 6 people, including myself to get the work done. I've probably got enough work for 8 people. Management understands I have enough work for 8 people but they have no budget to give me 8 people. So I get to figure out how to live within the budget and decide what may not get done.

Government needs to be run like this kind of a business. Government employees work for the taxpayers. A large number of taxpayers in this country are fed up with high taxes and are demanding the government cut spending. If the government employees lose a few benefits, well, welcome to the real world.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:47 PM   #23 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post

Government needs to be run like this kind of a business. Government employees work for the taxpayers. A large number of taxpayers in this country are fed up with high taxes and are demanding the government cut spending. If the government employees lose a few benefits, well, welcome to the real world.
Government, at any level, is not in the business to make a profit.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 03:00 PM   #24 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
[quote=dippin;2874227

The "unions'" history of violence? Talk about re-writing history.[/QUOTE]

Rewriting what history?

I worked as non-union office staff at a manufacturing company a number of years ago. The union at that company went on strike for four months. I still had a job to get to, and I was chased by pickets a couple of times because I dared to try to get to my job.

Then there's these references. Feel free to prove they never happened.

Union violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Examples of union violence include:
  • 2004 AFL-CIO push their way into a Republican field office in Orlando FL, breaking the wrist of one staffer. AFL-CIO member Van Church is unrepentant: "If his wrist was fractured, it's a result of his own actions in jerking the door the way he did."
  • 1999 - During protests by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1547 against a non-unionized workforce getting a contract, picketers threatened and assaulted workers, spat at them, sabotaged equipment, and shot guns near workers. The Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the union had engaged in "ongoing acts of intimidation, violence, destruction of property".
  • 1999 - During protests by Laborers' International Union of North America Local 310, picketers punched a worker, and threw coffee cups at workers.
  • 1999 - Members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120 were convicted of striking a worker, and imprisoning another one in a truck trailer.
  • 1998 - Teamsters Orestes Espinosa, Angel Mielgo, Werner Haechler, Benigno Rojas, and Adrian Paez beat, kicked, and stabbed a UPS worker (Rod Carter) who refused to strike, after Carter received a threatening phone call from the home of Anthony Cannestro, Sr., president of Teamsters Local 769.
  • 1998 - During the Communications Workers of America U.S. West strike a worker was threatened with a gun, and a manager was hit in the head with a rock.
  • 1990 - on the first day of The New York Daily News strike, trucks were attacked with stones and sticks. One union member was immediately arrested for transporting Molotov cocktails. Strikers followed replacement laborers and threatened them with baseball bats. Strikers then started threatening newsstands with arson, or stole all copies of the Daily News and burned them in front of the newsstands. Independent sources estimated over a thousand reports of threats. The newspaper recorded over two thousand legal violations. The Police Department, recorded more than 500 incidents. 50 strikers were arrested. Bombings of delivery trucks became common, with 11 strikers arrested on one day in October.
  • 1984 - Taxi driver David Wilkie was killed by NUM strikers while driving a non-striking worker during the UK mining strike
  • 1983 - Eddie York was murdered for crossing a United Mine Workers (UMW) picket line.
  • 1926 - Striking workers derail The Flying Scotsman train with over 100 passengers on board
Union Violence Victim Wins Settlement Against Teamsters Union | National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation

Quote:
National Right to Work Foundation attorneys have forced Teamsters Local 769 to pay a monetary settlement for its direct involvement in a bloody attack on Rod Carter during the 1997 nationwide Teamsters strike against United Parcel Service (UPS).
The SEIU and Union Violence: When will the violence stop, Mr. Stern? | RedState

Quote:
According to the Center for Union Facts, an average of nearly 300 incidents of (reported) union violence occur every year. In one example, a three-year strike conducted by the Teamsters against the trucking company, Overnite Transportation (now UPS Freight), produced 55 shootings and prompted the Teamsters to settle with the National Labor Relations Board by posting a four-page notice on the union’s website where the union agreed that (among other things):
“WE WILL NOT brandish or carry any weapon of any kind, including, but not limited to, guns, knives, slingshots, rocks, ball bearings, liquid-filled balloons or other projectiles, sledge hammers, bricks, sticks, or two by fours . . ..


---------- Post added at 06:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
Government, at any level, is not in the business to make a profit.
No, but it has to live within the budget that taxpayers are willing to support. Obama and his buddies are discovering that now.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 03:04 PM   #25 (permalink)
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
Rewriting what history?

I worked as non-union office staff at a manufacturing company a number of years ago. The union at that company went on strike for four months. I still had a job to get to, and I was chased by pickets a couple of times because I dared to try to get to my job.

Then there's these references. Feel free to prove they never happened.

Union violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Union Violence Victim Wins Settlement Against Teamsters Union | National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation



The SEIU and Union Violence: When will the violence stop, Mr. Stern? | RedState
If you look objectively, I think you will find the list is much longer on the management side.

---------- Post added at 06:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------


Quote:
No, but it has to live within the budget that taxpayers are willing to support. Obama and his buddies are discovering that now.
It goes beyond the scope of this particularly discussion, but conservatives seem to think that slashing state and federal budgets will solve the problem...with no adverse impacts (economic and social) resulting from those cuts.

It wont. Tax increases also have to be part of the mix and until the Republicans in state houses and Congress accept it, there will be no meaningful debt reduction.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 02-18-2011 at 03:06 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 03:41 PM   #26 (permalink)
Walking is Still Honest
 
FoolThemAll's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
Forget 'violent', Washington's state employees unions are just plain useless. They're seemingly in place simply to collect involuntary union dues. You know, because this wonderful safeguard for the 'rights' of workers is popular enough to need the force of law to retain its members.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome.
FoolThemAll is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 03:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
Government, at any level, is not in the business to make a profit.
This idea and the idea that government doesn't produce anything are two big problems in the Right's thinking.

I have no problem with the government making money, maybe it is collecting tolls, entrance fees at national parks, giving VIP tours to NASA/FBI/historic sites, collecting taxes and increasing the taxes if it will help save money by reducing gas, healthcare expenses, or environmental problems.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 04:57 PM   #28 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
It goes beyond the scope of this particularly discussion, but conservatives seem to think that slashing state and federal budgets will solve the problem...with no adverse impacts (economic and social) resulting from those cuts.

It wont. Tax increases also have to be part of the mix and until the Republicans in state houses and Congress accept it, there will be no meaningful debt reduction.
tax increases on who? the people are tired of taxes being raised. raising a tax right now guarantees a loss in the next election.

---------- Post added at 06:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003 View Post
This idea and the idea that government doesn't produce anything are two big problems in the Right's thinking.

I have no problem with the government making money, maybe it is collecting tolls, entrance fees at national parks, giving VIP tours to NASA/FBI/historic sites, collecting taxes and increasing the taxes if it will help save money by reducing gas, healthcare expenses, or environmental problems.
government only consumes.

please show examples of where government makes profits?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-18-2011, 07:21 PM   #29 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
Rewriting what history?

I worked as non-union office staff at a manufacturing company a number of years ago. The union at that company went on strike for four months. I still had a job to get to, and I was chased by pickets a couple of times because I dared to try to get to my job.

Then there's these references. Feel free to prove they never happened.

Union violence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Union Violence Victim Wins Settlement Against Teamsters Union | National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation



The SEIU and Union Violence: When will the violence stop, Mr. Stern? | RedState



---------- Post added at 06:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------


No, but it has to live within the budget that taxpayers are willing to support. Obama and his buddies are discovering that now.

So in a couple of centuries worth of unionizing the "history of violence" is a murder and a broken wrist?

The fact is that there is really no comparison between the "violence" employed by unions and the use violence by the national guard and militias to bust unions. There is a reason why many of the cases of union busting have "massacre" in the name.

---------- Post added at 07:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:42 PM ----------

By the way, let's be clear here. This isn't about the importance of balancing a budget, this isn't about whether unions have problems or not, this isn't about big government vs small government.

It is about union busting and ideology. The budget shortfall didn't exist until the passing of further tax cuts, and the law isn't about just trimming back benefits or reducing spending. It is about making it illegal to bargain on benefits or to ever request a wage increase above inflation.

Let's stop trying to dress this bullshit up as some sort of libertarian small government deal. This government passed very targeted tax cuts and in order to pay for them they are not only changing benefits and all that, but also reducing workers rights. No matter what your view of unions is, there is no other way to describe this as something other than taking away the rights of some people. Oh, but the unions that endorsed Walker are exempt of all of this.

Last edited by dippin; 02-18-2011 at 07:24 PM..
dippin is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 05:55 AM   #30 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Thanks, dippin.....no one here talks about the tax-cuts that Wisconsin just passed in January. So they cut taxes and then a month later panic about a budget shortfall? Doesn't pass the smell test.

"Solutions" to these budget issues always starts with bending the workers over, not cutting entitlements to businesses and campaign contributors.
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 06:34 AM   #31 (permalink)
has all her shots.
 
mixedmedia's Avatar
 
Location: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin View Post
By the way, let's be clear here. This isn't about the importance of balancing a budget, this isn't about whether unions have problems or not, this isn't about big government vs small government.

It is about union busting and ideology. The budget shortfall didn't exist until the passing of further tax cuts, and the law isn't about just trimming back benefits or reducing spending. It is about making it illegal to bargain on benefits or to ever request a wage increase above inflation.

Let's stop trying to dress this bullshit up as some sort of libertarian small government deal. This government passed very targeted tax cuts and in order to pay for them they are not only changing benefits and all that, but also reducing workers rights. No matter what your view of unions is, there is no other way to describe this as something other than taking away the rights of some people. Oh, but the unions that endorsed Walker are exempt of all of this.
needs to be shouted from the rooftops.

if there is any hope for this country remaining a 'beacon' of anything good in the world, folks will have to open their eyes and see.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
mixedmedia is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 06:53 AM   #32 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Koch Brothers Behind Wisconsin Effort To Kill Public Unions - Rick Ungar - The Policy Page - Forbes

least shocking news of the day
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:01 AM   #33 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
The blaming of unions is ironic in that the creation and administration of a labour union in the first place is usually the result of poor management.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:07 AM   #34 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
The worst part is that this is such a blatantly political move that the 4 unions that endorsed Walker are exempt from this. Can anyone here defend that? This is clientelistic politics at its worse, the sort of stuff that you'd expect from mid 20th century Latin dictators. Tax cuts for one republican constituency, protections for the republican unions, and a major, major kick in the nuts for all the other unions that didn't endorse Walker.
dippin is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:27 AM   #35 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin View Post

Let's stop trying to dress this bullshit up as some sort of libertarian small government deal. This government passed very targeted tax cuts and in order to pay for them they are not only changing benefits and all that, but also reducing workers rights. No matter what your view of unions is, there is no other way to describe this as something other than taking away the rights of some people. Oh, but the unions that endorsed Walker are exempt of all of this.
And what about the rights of the public to not have the government take so much of their income in taxes? The response attributed to unions in one article was that the state needed to increase taxes. That's idiotic.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
And what about the rights of the public to not have the government take so much of their income in taxes? The response attributed to unions in one article was that the state needed to increase taxes. That's idiotic.
Show me the part of the constitution that enumerates the "right of the public to not have the government take so much of their income in taxes"
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:43 AM   #37 (permalink)
Junkie
 
dogzilla's Avatar
 
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
Show me the part of the constitution that enumerates the "right of the public to not have the government take so much of their income in taxes"
It's called the right to vote, as in voting out the politicians who don't understand the public is fed up with taxes. If the current politicians don't understand it, they will be replaced until we do get a government that understands that.
dogzilla is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 07:54 AM   #38 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
for the life of me i cannot figure out how this one-dimensional petit-bourgeois view of taxation as taking-away-my-shit persists, even on the net which presupposes publicly funded electrical and mixed public-private telecommunications infrastructures, on computers that you would not have were it not for publicly funded railroad and highway systems, the consistency of which are conditions of possibility for the walmartization of commodity prices that this same one-dimensional view of the world would simply impute to a fact of nature or the Virtues of Exporting Captialist Exploitation to Places Where Labor Is Cheap. there's no way to move from this petit-bourgeois know nothing-ism coherent views of unions or states or redistributions of wealth. amazing.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 08:07 AM   #39 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Taxes aren't even that high in Wisconsin.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-19-2011, 08:19 AM   #40 (permalink)
Crazy, indeed
 
Location: the ether
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
And what about the rights of the public to not have the government take so much of their income in taxes? The response attributed to unions in one article was that the state needed to increase taxes. That's idiotic.
Except that the tax cut wasn't for the "public," but for a specific group of business. Just like the issues go beyond just cutting the current amount of benefits, but about completely eliminating any form of collective bargaining for the unions that didn't endorse this specific government.

No amount of hand waving will eliminate that. This sort of oversimplification of the good public interest versus the bad teacher is so stupid and misleading I can't keep repeating myself over and over again. But here it goes:

Quote:
Let's stop trying to dress this bullshit up as some sort of libertarian small government deal. This government passed very targeted tax cuts and in order to pay for them they are not only changing benefits and all that, but also reducing workers rights. No matter what your view of unions is, there is no other way to describe this as something other than taking away the rights of some people. Oh, but the unions that endorsed Walker are exempt of all of this.

But hey, how about we pass a tax cut for union employees, and to pay for that we take away from a core constituency of the republican party? After all, that would be essentially the same, except we'd be flipping the winners and losers based on their support last election.
dippin is offline  
 

Tags
turns, unionbusting, volitile, wisconsin

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360