Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2011, 07:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
What should be done about the pirates in Somalia?

A few days ago, a group of pirates took over a sailboat with 4 Americans on-board. It looks like the US Navy stepped in (after being shot at), and things didn't turn out so good.

Now, this has been going on for some time. And the USA Today thinks that organized crime has taken over instead of out-of-work fishermen.

4 American hostages killed by pirates, U.S. says - USATODAY.com

Now, what should be done with Somalia? Should we just leave them alone and make all ships travel down to South Africa? Or should the UN or the major naval nations setup a blockade 12 miles off the coast. Any ships departing Somalia and crossing that line will be sunk? I know the Russians have taken a hard line stance and are using the old maritime laws on piracy to kill pirates. How Russians Deal With Pirates They just blow up the pirates boat with them tied up on it.

I am thinking that the second option would be the right one. I know that there are already naval warships from lots of different nations there, but I don't see why we couldn't work together and block every boat along the 1800 mile long coast. Most of the coast is desert and wouldn't have much activity.

Oh, and the 15 pirates that the Navy caught. I would recommend that they be shot or made to walk the plank a few hundred miles from shore. Why should we have to pay millions of taxpayer dollars to bring them here, put them on trial, and house them in jail for ~30 years?

Last edited by ASU2003; 02-24-2011 at 07:07 PM..
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 07:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
I have to agree with enforcing old Pirate Law. Honestly right now there's no downside to a Somali pirate. If you succeed you get more money than most in America will ever see in their lives. If you fail... you get regular meals and a bed for the rest of your life.

It's a daunting task that you can't catch everyone... but if a boat leaves the Somali Coast and they have guns either all guns must be thrown overboard or punch a hole in the boat and let them swim.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 05:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
People in masks cannot be trusted
 
Xazy's Avatar
 
Location: NYC
There was an Italian cruise line that hired Israeli guards and in 2009 that fought off pirates.

I am all for taking the fight there with a zero tolerance rule. If combat happens use over whelming force, until they get the picture.

The pirates for the most part are teens and early 20s they make a fortune of money, and are treated like royalty. If we remove that incentive by using guards and force then it will be harder for them to recruit.
__________________
Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.
Xazy is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 05:38 AM   #4 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
There's a better way to fight piracy coming out of Somalia.

Finding an end to the civil war, finding an end to illegal foreign fishing, and finding a solution to the toxic waste problem.

THE TWO PIRACIES IN SOMALIA: WHY THE WORLD IGNORES THE OTHER?
3. Toxic Waste Behind Somali Pirates | Project Censored
Alshahid Network Somalia deputy prime minister: Toxic waste dumping in Somali coast is the cause of piracy

If all of this comes as a surprise to you (as it had to me), this might help you understand why:
Jeff Nygaard: Pirates, Profits and Propaganda


Brief history lesson: the civil war in Somalia has been going on since 1991, where 300,000 to 400,000 people have died (that's 3 to 4 times the estimated number of civilian deaths in the Iraq war). In 2010 alone, more than 3,000 people have died.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 02-25-2011 at 05:45 AM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 05:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
it might also help if governments stopped restricting the right to bear arms.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 08:54 AM   #6 (permalink)
Who You Crappin?
 
Derwood's Avatar
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Man, I'm dizzy from that spin
__________________
"You can't shoot a country until it becomes a democracy." - Willravel
Derwood is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 09:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
it might also help if governments stopped restricting the right to bear arms.
We should invade to enforce that right?

Your Constitutional rights end at the border. And I don't think that anyone has ever said that sailors can't arm themselves.

But let's keep this on pirates, shall we?

Really, I don't see where there's much to be done beyond setting up a task force to watch for pirates. An international peacekeeping force isn't going to be able to accomplish much with no government to prop up, only feuding warlords. Elections are pretty much impossible. The Etheopians have had some success bringing some stability to the southern parts of the country, but that's limited at best. And enforcing the old pirate codes would be distasteful to many of the countries that would normally be called on to do so.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 10:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz View Post
We should invade to enforce that right?

Your Constitutional rights end at the border. And I don't think that anyone has ever said that sailors can't arm themselves.

But let's keep this on pirates, shall we?
the point is, how does one fare against a group of priates with automatic weapons, unless that person has automatic weapons? can an american citizen get an automatic weapon to keep on his boat when out sailing???? no, because the government doesn't want civilians to be as equally armed as they are, so we civilians just have to be outgunned on the open seas.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 10:20 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i'm not sure that more weapons would fit into somalia.

Quote:
Despite an arms embargo imposed in 1992, Somalia remains a key market for illegal small arms and light weapons for the Horn of Africa countries. The lack of a central government for the past 15 years has meant no government control over the illegal importation, acquisition and disposal of arms. The porous boarders with neighboring states such as Kenya has meant easy access to new markets hence the high number of illegal small arms and light weapons in the entire region. The common types of arms in Somalia range from �side arms through sub-machine guns to �technicals�, modified anti-aircraft artillery or heavy machine guns mounted on the back of pick-up trucks' ( Mogadishu , AFP Aug 30).
Nairobi Secretariat on Small Arms


i'm not sure how much there is to be done. john wayne shoot-em-up fantasies are unlikely to have much effect. it's clear that many of the folk who engage in this action are willing to risk their lives for the big pay-offs. stabilizing the political and economic situations would likely help, but as usual with such things there's neither agreement nor mechanisms that enable transnational action to happen.

so nothing will.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 10:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
dk, given that the piracy zone is literally on the other side of the planet and that any sailors going into that zone would by necessity have to go through other ports to get to the piracy zone where they would have much easier access to purchasing automatic weapons, I can't decide if you're trolling this thread or just throwing up a strawman. This is not a purely American problem by any means. This is an international problem.

So:



-+-{Important TFP Staff Message}-+-
This thread is not about the 2nd Amendment. Stop trying to make it into one.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 11:05 AM   #11 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz View Post
We should invade to enforce that right?

Your Constitutional rights end at the border. And I don't think that anyone has ever said that sailors can't arm themselves.

Really, I don't see where there's much to be done beyond setting up a task force to watch for pirates. An international peacekeeping force isn't going to be able to accomplish much with no government to prop up, only feuding warlords. Elections are pretty much impossible. The Etheopians have had some success bringing some stability to the southern parts of the country, but that's limited at best. And enforcing the old pirate codes would be distasteful to many of the countries that would normally be called on to do so.
You can have 'legal' guns in US waters, but once you go to Mexico or Canada the laws are different. In many ports, guns are banned or have to be handed over when arriving and then picked back up when you leave. It isn't worth it.

And I'm not talking about invading Somalia or bringing elections and a stable government. Maybe we could help Ethiopia take over part of the country to give them access to the sea, but that is a different discussion.

All I am suggesting is a change in tactics. A more offensive stance if you will. Many countries currently have to provide military escorts to convoys of ships sailing in that region. The military ships, helicopters, and UAVs are there. The UN or any one country isn't stepping up and coming up with a unified strategy of working together to stop pirates from leaving Somalia.

And this is the main reason that this and other countries created Navies and kept them around. We pay billions of dollars for all the ships we have, yet in the old days they had no choice but to kill criminals (they didn't have the food rations or space to keep them), yet it also was a pretty good deterrent.

I have no problems with warning them, but if they make the decision to go out to sea and look for ships to hold for ransom, they should be stopped.

And yes, over fishing and pollution might have been the reasons this started, but now it is a fairly low risk business venture for the druglords on land to make lots of money.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 11:24 AM   #12 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
I think that you'd find that a majority of the nations that would normally respond to a call for naval assistance (read: Western Europe) would require a caveat barring executions. An international task force that would enforce the laws as written would involve some strange bedfellows - Russia, China, Iran, Egypt, the US, etc.

The thing is that this smells a bit like "welfare queens" to me. By that I mean that you're looking at this as a low risk venture with no downside. It takes serious despiration to get into an open boat with a bunch of other armed men to chase down ships. I don't see that portion of the act as "low risk" given the possibilities of storms, breakdowns, bad navigation, failure to find any ships, etc. let alone finding a naval vessel by mistake. Let's remember that we have -no- data on how many pirates set out and never come back. It could be a huge percentage. It could be that all of them come back. We don't know.

And I can't imagine that pirates think that jail in a foreign country is a spectacular tradeoff either.

Finally, drugs are the problem in Somalia. If they were, there would be a bigger international outcry to fix the problem. These are simple warlords, interested only in controlling their little nest of territory.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 12:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz View Post
dk, given that the piracy zone is literally on the other side of the planet and that any sailors going into that zone would by necessity have to go through other ports to get to the piracy zone where they would have much easier access to purchasing automatic weapons, I can't decide if you're trolling this thread or just throwing up a strawman. This is not a purely American problem by any means. This is an international problem.
you can choose to consider it a troll or a strawman as you wish. To most people, i'm sure that is the only way they can see it. Much like roachboy states, that the 'pirates' are such bloodthirsty homicidal maniacs out on the ocean that no decent person stands any sort of chance of defense unless big strong government military forces ride to their rescue. But how long has piracy been a problem around the world? how many more deaths or hijackings do you think it will take before any single government chooses to intervene? my guess it that unless there emerges some sort of pirate group that becomes so large and bold to start targeting oil tankers, governments will do little, if anything, to actively patrol the ocean for them. So that leaves private citizens with two choices. don't sail or take your chances.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz View Post
So:



-+-{Important TFP Staff Message}-+-
This thread is not about the 2nd Amendment. Stop trying to make it into one.
So, in not turning this in to some sort of 2nd Amendment thread, at some point in time the WORLD is going to have to make a choice.

1) Do we start taking measures to provide for our own protection, or
2) Do we demand that governments around the world add the expense of increasing attack ships and combat sailors to patrol enough of the ocean to protect against pirates?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 12:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
Future Bureaucrat
 
KirStang's Avatar
 
UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 100:

Quote:
Article100

Duty to cooperate in the repression of piracy

All States shall cooperate to the fullest possible extent in the repression of piracy on the high seas or in any other place outside the jurisdiction of any State.
UNCLOS and Agreement on Part XI - Preamble and frame index

I think we should step up naval escorts in the area and radically rebalance the pirate's cost-benefit analysis. Right now, the benefits of piracy, appear to far outweigh the potential costs of piracy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieber Code on the laws of war
"Men who take up arms against one another in public war do not cease on this account to be moral beings, responsible to one another and to God."
KirStang is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 12:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
If I remember my Gilbert and Sullivan, all that needs to be done is for the Major General to invoke the pirates' loyalty to the Queen. They're all noblemen gone wrong, after all.

As far as I'm concerned, the Somali pirate problem is social and economic at it's core. Somalia is still a country living in extreme poverty, leaving piracy as a viable method for making money and securing the future of one's family. This is classic in failed states, where people without access to regular opportunities, turn to alternative opportunities in order to make ends meet. It's so simple, even Time Magazine figured it out, eventually. In short the answer is, and I can't believe I'm typing this, nation-building. I'm not talking about unilateral invasion, occupation, foreign contractors, never-ending war, etc., I'm talking about a new type of nation building, which works a little bit at a time.
Willravel is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:19 PM   #16 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Oh, where are you, Ustwo, to insert one of your facepalm pics? It's so desperately needed here!


Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
you can choose to consider it a troll or a strawman as you wish.
A troll is something that we don't tolerate around here. A strawman is tolerated but not really a respected argument. We're not going to turn this thread into something that it's not just because you want to talk 2nd Amendment. Start another thread if that's what you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
But how long has piracy been a problem around the world?
I'm going to go with thousands of years. Well before firearms were even invented, piracy was around. It's the reason that navies were invented. It's been out of the headlines because ships have grown so large that they're not usual targets. That's changed because of the problems in Somalia.

Oh, and "shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Hymn refers directly to the Barbary Wars of the 1790's against the Barbary pirates who raided US shipping.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
how many more deaths or hijackings do you think it will take before any single government chooses to intervene? my guess it that unless there emerges some sort of pirate group that becomes so large and bold to start targeting oil tankers, governments will do little, if anything, to actively patrol the ocean for them.
I am now accusing you of not bothering to read any posts in this thread. I'm also accusing you of having done absolutely no research on the topic or have any idea of what the current events are. If any of those accusations were false, then you'd know that several nations, including the Danes, Americans, Indians and Russians, have all actively engaged pirates in the Indian Ocean. And that the Russians killed all the pirates that they captured. If you'd read the thread, you'd have known that. If you'd researched the topic at all, you'd know that.

Governments are not "doing little". But it's a big ocean and there's only so much that they can do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
So that leaves private citizens with two choices. don't sail or take your chances.
Or with staying in the patrolled shipping lanes or in groups. If you'd read the thread, you'd know that ignoring that common sense suggestion got these folks killed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth

1) Do we start taking measures to provide for our own protection, or
2) Do we demand that governments around the world add the expense of increasing attack ships and combat sailors to patrol enough of the ocean to protect against pirates?
Given that piracy is the original reason for the creation of international law and that the US Navy's original charter refers to piracy, I think that choice 3 is "Let the navies do their jobs and figure out how to better coordinate to repel attacks." If I were I pirate, I wouldn't think too much about attacking a small vessel armed with automatic weapons, especially if there were more of us than you. If there were a naval vessel in the area, armed with guns bigger than anything I could ever muster, I wouldn't go pirating.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz View Post
armed with guns bigger than anything I could ever muster, I wouldn't go pirating.
that says it all right there. that's the obvious solution, except that it will never fit in with the general sheeple mindset.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
that says it all right there. that's the obvious solution, except that it will never fit in with the general sheeple mindset.
No, this proves right here that you've got a 1 track mind. The guns I'm talking about are naval guns that those on sailboats couldn't physically mount on their boats and ones that the owners of commercial ships don't want to mount because of the expense.

Dk, you're waaaaaaaay out of your league here. It's obvious that you don't even know anything about the guns that you want to discuss. Because if you did, you'd already know that some ship owners are putting armed mercenaries on some of their ships in the region, and those mercenaries have had some success in repelling pirates. Some ship owners have also armed their crew, although not all crewmen want to be armed.

Give it up, man. You're just making yourself look stupid, which you're not. But someone who hasn't seen your other posts might assume that you are.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
So what can be done beyond the 20+ nation anti-piracy naval commitments that are currently being undertaken in the area?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:10 PM   #20 (permalink)
Future Bureaucrat
 
KirStang's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
So what can be done beyond the 20+ nation anti-piracy naval commitments that are currently being undertaken in the area?
One of THESE:



/facetious
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieber Code on the laws of war
"Men who take up arms against one another in public war do not cease on this account to be moral beings, responsible to one another and to God."
KirStang is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:23 PM   #21 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I was hoping someone would bring up nukes.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:36 PM   #22 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
I think we can all agree that if the people on the sailboat were armed to the teeth, it would have been more difficult for pirates to take it over. It could have lead to a massive shootout at sea of the kinds we might see in a Bond movie, but the vessel would have been more difficult to take. Though I hate guns, I'm able to admit that.
Willravel is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:42 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
I think we can all agree that if the people on the sailboat were armed to the teeth, it would have been more difficult for pirates to take it over. It could have lead to a massive shootout at sea of the kinds we might see in a Bond movie, but the vessel would have been more difficult to take. Though I hate guns, I'm able to admit that.
pretty much what I was trying to say, but then I got unloaded on.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:50 PM   #24 (permalink)
Asshole
 
The_Jazz's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Then you should have said it instead of doing a drive-by on the the thread, dk. And maybe you want to deign to come down off that mountain of guns you're sitting on to tell us believers in naval power why we should arm recreational sailors that are dumb enough to leave their convoys in known pirate areas.

Do you have any evidence that any of these folks wanted to carry guns? No, you don't.

Do you have any evidence that if they wanted to carry guns that they were denied them? No, you don't.

Do you know anything about the naval task force operating in the area? No, you don't.

Congratulations, you've successfully trolled the thread. Whee.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin
"There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo
The_Jazz is offline  
Old 03-10-2011, 01:05 PM   #25 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: right behind you...
The whole average Somalian makes an average of $600 USD a year doesn't help.
WhoaitsZ is offline  
Old 03-12-2011, 01:05 PM   #26 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
$600 might be a lot if a house cost $5,000, food was $100/year, and a boat cost $1200... And if all of your neighbors were making that amount too...

But rebuilding an economy can only be done if there isn't a large criminal cartel glamorizing 'easy' money
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 03-12-2011, 01:26 PM   #27 (permalink)
Alien Anthropologist
 
hunnychile's Avatar
 
Location: Between Boredom and Nirvana
Give them a "Trial At Sea". Perhaps they need to be keelhauled first.

I'm tired of pirates who think they can make the rules. They are wrong, and they need to be dealt with.
__________________
"I need compassion, understanding and chocolate." - NJB
hunnychile is offline  
Old 03-12-2011, 04:07 PM   #28 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003 View Post
But rebuilding an economy can only be done if there isn't a large criminal cartel glamorizing 'easy' money
Or if there isn't a decades-long civil war....
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 02:38 PM   #29 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: right behind you...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Or if there isn't a decades-long civil war....
exactly.

these pirates are terrible and must be dealt with accordingly. that said, I feel bad for them. their country is broke, their jobs are broke, weapons plentiful...

if i were attacked i'd have no issues killing them. at the same time, were it possible to help them learn to help themselves, i'd rather take that route.

all i'm saying is its not much different than most street gangs. kid has nothing, no food, shelter, care.... he finds it with thugs.

it's a vicious cycle.
WhoaitsZ is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 12:19 PM   #30 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Well shit. It turns out that the Somali pirate situation is a bit more complicated than the Western Media has led us to believe.

Quote:
Johann Hari: You are being lied to about pirates
Some are clearly just gangsters. But others are trying to stop illegal dumping and trawling

Who imagined that in 2009, the world's governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the US to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth. But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labelling as "one of the great menaces of our times" have an extraordinary story to tell – and some justice on their side.

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the "golden age of piracy" – from 1650 to 1730 – the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage Bluebeard that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: pirates were often saved from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can't? In his book Villains Of All Nations, the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence.

If you became a merchant or navy sailor then – plucked from the docks of London's East End, young and hungry – you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the Cat O' Nine Tails. If you slacked often, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied – and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively, without torture. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls "one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the eighteenth century".

They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed "quite clearly – and subversively – that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal Navy." This is why they were romantic heroes, despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age, a young British man called William Scott, should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: "What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirateing to live." In 1991, the government of Somalia collapsed. Its nine million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country's food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.

Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: "Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it." Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to "dispose" of cheaply. When I asked Mr Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: "Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention."

At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia's seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by overexploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300m-worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are being stolen every year by illegal trawlers. The local fishermen are now starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: "If nothing is done, there soon won't be much fish left in our coastal waters."

This is the context in which the "pirates" have emerged. Somalian fishermen took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least levy a "tax" on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia – and ordinary Somalis agree. The independent Somalian news site WardheerNews found 70 per cent "strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence".

No, this doesn't make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters – especially those who have held up World Food Programme supplies. But in a telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali: "We don't consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas." William Scott would understand.

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our toxic waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We won't act on those crimes – the only sane solution to this problem – but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit-corridor for 20 per cent of the world's oil supply, we swiftly send in the gunboats.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarised by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know "what he meant by keeping possession of the sea." The pirate smiled, and responded: "What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor." Once again, our great imperial fleets sail – but who is the robber?
Johann Hari: You are being lied to about pirates - Johann Hari, Commentators - The Independent

This is more than a little distressing to read. While there are some Somali pirates that are just thieves, many are trying desperately to protect their territorial waters from exploitation by polluters and commercial over-fishing. In our push to take on Somali pirates, I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the British, Chinese and Americans are all to glad to lump in the righteous with the guilty.

I was very wrong above. The solution to this is not simply nation-building, it's going after polluters and commercial fishermen so that Somalia has even a chance to become a functioning nation again. Without fishing in safe seas, Somalia faces no real options in rebooting their economy.
Willravel is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 09:54 AM   #31 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
There are definitely international crimes and incursions into Somalian waters, but hijacking sailboats, naval ships, and shipping vessels with lots of guns isn't the way to stop the dumping.

In the paper today, it said that 5 were convicted in the attack on a US Navy ship and will spend the rest of their lives in a US prison, that probably costs more than Tent City or a bullet.

India captured 61 the other day, yet I don't know what they will do. They have enough people to take care of too.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:08 AM   #32 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
So, again, the problem with Somalia isn't the pirates.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:35 AM   #33 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
...
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."

Last edited by Plan9; 03-15-2011 at 10:43 AM.. Reason: Whoops!
Plan9 is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 12:48 PM   #34 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
So, again, the problem with Somalia isn't the pirates.
The symptom has become the problem.

What 'may' have started as a bunch of fishermen commandeering fishing boats and waste barges has turned into hijacking sailboats and other craft that have every right to safely pass through their waters without getting taken for ransom.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 03:59 PM   #35 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Oh, I'm not saying the pirates don't cause problems in those waters. I'm saying that it doesn't help all that much to focus on them as one aspect. You aren't going to stop piracy simply by catching and punishing all the pirates you can.

Why did we go into Afghanistan? Why didn't we just try to catch the terrorists coming out of there? Wasn't the problem simply with the terrorists? No.

Most violence in the world has deeper root causes that go beyond the direct violence itself. We can focus on the violence to make us feel better that we're doing something to halt it. But will it stop more violence from arising? Not necessarily.

Think about criminal activity. Much of that is tied into poverty. Poverty itself isn't necessarily solved by throwing money at it either. Like most major problems, it requires a multifaceted solution. In the case of poverty, it's often an issue of access to quality education (especially among women) and affordable health care and housing.

With the piracy, the source is tied into a number of problems: civil war, pollution, illegal fishing, etc. You can go after the pirates, yes, but will it stop the piracy. I don't know. I say not likely.

Why do we always think about Somalia these days when we think of piracy? What about all those other pirates causing problems elsewhere? What do you have to say about them?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 07:35 PM   #36 (permalink)
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Why did we go into Afghanistan? Why didn't we just try to catch the terrorists coming out of there? Wasn't the problem simply with the terrorists? No.

With the piracy, the source is tied into a number of problems: civil war, pollution, illegal fishing, etc. You can go after the pirates, yes, but will it stop the piracy. I don't know. I say not likely.

Why do we always think about Somalia these days when we think of piracy? What about all those other pirates causing problems elsewhere? What do you have to say about them?
Afghanistan could have been fought as a war against terrorists. Instead of making them go into hiding by sending in the uniformed military, they were right out in the open before.

The problem with Somalia is the warlords and gangs now control everything. They have the money, they have the power. The international Navies could easily contain the pirates by using technology and lethal force. This has gone on long enough. Sure you can leaf the towns with filers saying if they go out to sea, they will die to warn them not to, but nothing can be done to fix the country until you stop the piracy.

And I feel the same way about piracy in Hawaii, Mexico, and the Caribbean. It isn't as frequent or as far away from the coast like in Somalia, but piracy needs to be dealt with in the same way. There are enough people on this planet, nobody will miss a few thugs.
ASU2003 is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 07:43 PM   #37 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: right behind you...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003 View Post

And I feel the same way about piracy in Hawaii, Mexico, and the Caribbean. It isn't as frequent or as far away from the coast like in Somalia, but piracy needs to be dealt with in the same way. There are enough people on this planet, nobody will miss a few thugs.
no one but their families but fuck them, amrite?
WhoaitsZ is offline  
Old 03-15-2011, 08:08 PM   #38 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada


Well, there are lots of things amiss in Somalia. The piracy to me seems like the tip of the iceberg. If there were an easy solution to stop the piracy, it would have been accomplished by now, if not reduced to a marginal issue.

While it's a terrible thing that those 4 Americans lost their lives recently, it's a much greater travesty that the so-far-20-year Somali civil war death toll is up to 300,000 or 400,000.

That's equivalent to about half the population of Washington, D.C.

Oh, and toxic waste and illegal fishing.

Somalia has been metaphorically raped repeatedly over a couple of decades now, and everyone is crying foul about the pirates but don't seem all that concerned about stopping the other stuff that's happening in the area.

Yes, the piracy is bad. Yes, it would be great to stop it. Throwing naval power at it won't necessarily stop it. They've tried that. They're still trying it.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

Tags
pirates, somalia

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360