Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2004, 11:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
Upright
 
5% undecided

Even after both conventions there are still 5% or more of likely voters who have not made up your mind. Considering how different the canidates are, why haven't you made up your minds?
zandor45w is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: Swooping down on you from above....
Your guess is as good as anybody's. But I'll tell you this, that 5% will decide this election.
Flyguy is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
WoW or Class...
 
BigGov's Avatar
 
Location: UWW
Because they despise both?

Because the wording of the poll could have been done incorrectly?

Because they have something better to do than make up their minds months in advance?

I doubt this 5% will decide the election, it's people that will get out and actually vote. 50% turnout over the past few years has been the norm, if that other 50% gets off their collective bi-partisan asses and gets out and votes, then that 5% might matter. Apparently it's easy for a bunch of people to vote in a simple poll someone calls them up with, but when it comes time in November it apparently because extremely difficult to find that simple poll and voice your opinion.
__________________
One day an Englishman, a Scotsman, and an Irishman walked into a pub together. They each bought a pint of Guinness. Just as they were about to enjoy their creamy beverage, three flies landed in each of their pints. The Englishman pushed his beer away in disgust. The Scotsman fished the fly out of his beer and continued drinking it, as if nothing had happened. The Irishman, too, picked the fly out of his drink but then held it out over the beer and yelled "SPIT IT OUT, SPIT IT OUT, YOU BASTARD!"
BigGov is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Easy - both candidates suck in different but equally important ways. I'm decided on who I'm voting for, but if you were to ask me to decide between Bush and Kerry I would be undecided right now. Remember, there are still debates - these undecided people may simply be people who want to make sure they get as much of the info as possible before making a decision.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Sauce Puppet
 
kurty[B]'s Avatar
 
I'm undecided, and of the opinion I want as much info as possible before voting. Right now, I'm heavily leaning towards Kerry, but I'm not going to say I'm definitely voting for him until I have as much information as possible.
kurty[B] is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 11:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Psycho
 
CoachAlan's Avatar
 
Location: Las Vegas
I was in the Kerry camp because I strongly didn't like Bush. But as time passes, I'm finding plenty of reasons not to like Kerry. For this reason, I have switched from Kerry to undecided.

I also don't like Nader, and the libertarian platform is too far out for me. So I'm waiting for the debates, essentially hoping Kerry will say something to win me over. I'm sure he's 10x the debater that Bush is, so chances are I'll be voting for Kerry. If he doesn't, then I'll try to find a third party candidate I can go with.
__________________
"If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!"
- Mark Twain
CoachAlan is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachAlan
I was in the Kerry camp because I strongly didn't like Bush. But as time passes, I'm finding plenty of reasons not to like Kerry. For this reason, I have switched from Kerry to undecided.

I also don't like Nader, and the libertarian platform is too far out for me. So I'm waiting for the debates, essentially hoping Kerry will say something to win me over. I'm sure he's 10x the debater that Bush is, so chances are I'll be voting for Kerry. If he doesn't, then I'll try to find a third party candidate I can go with.
I'll go ahead and say, as a solid Dem, that Bush is a difficult person to debate. He comes across naturally, and with a command of the principles, if not always a command of the facts. In my mind, the debates are a tossup at this point.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 12:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
Good point.

Say what you must about President Bush, he can give the impression of a very personable guy. He won't always say the right thing or he may mispronounce it, but in a debate, especially a televised debate, it isn't always what you say, but how you say it.

I can't say I'm a fan of the President, but I know better than to write him off just yet.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 01:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
In debates I would (unbiased) go for Bush.

Bush is a very personable debator, and always seems calm and comfterble. He gives simple answers that people appreciate and make great soundbites. Kerry gives long drawn out answers. These are GREAT in the Senate where not saying the wrong thing is more important than saying the right thing. But the public doesnt like these types of answers, and I have never seen a picture of him where he looks natural. Be it snowboarding or flipping waffles he always looks like he's trying to figure out why he's there.
Seaver is offline  
Old 09-03-2004, 02:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Illusionary
 
tecoyah's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
In debates I would (unbiased) go for Bush.

Bush is a very personable debator, and always seems calm and comfterble. He gives simple answers that people appreciate and make great soundbites. Kerry gives long drawn out answers. These are GREAT in the Senate where not saying the wrong thing is more important than saying the right thing. But the public doesnt like these types of answers, and I have never seen a picture of him where he looks natural. Be it snowboarding or flipping waffles he always looks like he's trying to figure out why he's there.

I'm sorry....but I need to side with someone a bit more....shall we say intellectual than Mr. Bush. Speaking coherently is a prerequisite to debate in America. I would also appreciate someone who uses words we can all agree are......real.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
tecoyah is offline  
 

Tags
undecided


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73