Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2005, 11:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky called "fiction-writers" by By James DeMeo, Ph.D.

I am interested in comments in defense of Chomsky or of points made by James Demeo. Demeo apparently threw Moore's name into the article simply
to whip up sentiment. Do you think that this is an effort to deflect and distract criticism of U.S. administration policies and military and diplomatic activities?
Quote:
<a href="http://globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=515">http://globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=515</a>
Noam Chomsky: Propanganda and Lies

4/1/2005
By James DeMeo, Ph.D.

For awhile, it seemed the European intellectual scene would be completely flooded by the conspiracy materials, without any counter-critique whatsoever, when Der Spiegel waded in 2003 into the quagmire with the article "Panoply of the Absurd" (1) revealing the most obvious distortions and fabrications, and in so doing, considerably drained the swamp. However, Der Spiegel (a liberal-left publication with anti-American sentiments) avoided discussion of two of the larger and probably more radically "serious" but willfully deceptive critics of the USA, Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky, whose influence and book sales have soared in inverse proportion to their factual content. Fans of these two fiction-writers certainly will protest to hear them described as having abandoned factual emphasis, so I shall give a few of the essentials, with web links for access to the full load of devastating, though "struggling to catch-up" truth. Like the 9-11 conspiracy-theory books, these two authors appear to have a much larger audience in Europe than in America.

Noam Chomsky is best known for his missives against the USA and Israel, who are misportrayed as the cause of all the world's problems.(2) In this, he echoes the Islamo-fascists who rail against the "Great Satan" and "Little Satan", an idee fixe so intellectually nailed to the floor that he successfully avoids any mention of the genocidal butchery and crimes committed by the "Saharasian" Soviet Union, Red China and the multiple branches of the COMINTERN (100 million dead from that nasty bunch)(3) -- except perhaps to either blame their crimes on the USA and Israel, or deny that they occurred at all. But most people reading Chomsky won't know about his friendly relations with the Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis, except perhaps in France where those relationships have been more widely exposed. Chomsky wrote a glowing endorsement-foreword to a 1980 French-language autobiography by Robert Faurisson, who is best known for his many writings which claim the Holocaust never happened and the Nazi gas chambers did not exist.(4) In 1984 Chomsky gave the publishing rights to one of his books to a French neo-Nazi publisher, rescuing it from bankruptcy,(5) and he co-authored another book with a radical terrorist apologist, Edward Said, published in 1983 by a notorious neo-Nazi publishing house in the USA.(6) His books and audiotapes are openly sold and/or indexed on neo-Nazi websites, along with the writings of Adolf Hitler and nearly every historical revisionist and Holocaust denier imaginable, with no apparent embarrasment or objections by Chomsky.(7) And as late as 1986 he allowed one of his articles to appear in the Journal of Historical Review, mouthpiece for the anti-Semitic neo-Nazi Institute for Historical Review, which gives favorable attention to most all his other writings.(8) There is more.

Until most recently I had no idea about the extent of Chomsky's anti-Semitic activities, as in the USA and probably in most of Europe as well, he successfully passes himself as a "radical anti-capitalist" and "rational social critic" from the political Left. Full documentation on this matter is presented in the well-researched book by Werner Cohn, "Partners in Hate: Noam Chomsky and the Holocaust Deniers."(9) The book also is posted on-line by the author, who is a Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of British Columbia. Deborah Lipstadt, a powerful anti-fascist scholar who had done battle with the neo-Nazis on many occasions, also addressed the sordid Chomsky-Faurisson matter,(10) and most books factually discussing modern anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial will include a discussion on Chomsky. His die-hard supporters, however, either claim Chomsky's actions are a "defense of free-speech rights for Holocaust-deniers" (certainly it is much more than that), or they don't want to know about it at all. His distortions both in supporting the Holocaust deniers, and then trying to misrepresent his support as merely "defending free speech" is part of a larger pattern of misrepresentations which permeate his entire body of writings.

Many legitimate and respectable internet sites and books provide a veritable index-list of specific rebuttals to Chomsky's claims and writings, correcting his multiple distortions of historical and recent events.(11) A particularly good book is "The Anti-Chomsky Reader" Edited by Peter Collier and David Horowitz, published in late 2004. (12)

Among the revelations are his flirtations and embrace of Stalinism and Holocaust-denial, as well as justification of Islamist terrorism. The above revelations, and a good examination of the specific critical materials cited, should discredit Chomsky for anyone with genuinely liberal sentiments, a.k.a. someone concerned about genocide, justice, human rights, freedom, honesty, genuine scholarship, totalitarianism, etc.

But people who drink from the revisionist's poisoned well spew hate at Americans, "The Jews" (or euphemisms for Jews, such as Zionists, international bankers, gold traders, money lenders, etc.) and Western democracy in general. In fact, Western democracy has become the new scapegoat among those who enjoy all the benefits the West can offer, while simultaneously openly supporting the most blood-soaked dictators and totalitarian fanatics one could imagine. The strange phenomenon of Western intellectuals, movie-stars and the so-called anti-war activists, throwing hate at Bush only to give big friendly hugs to mass-murderers like Saddam Hussein or Kim Jung Il.

They would have us believe, the world would be a better place if only the West, in general, and the US and Israel, in particular, would cease to exist. Chomsky's widespread network of imitators and supporters, who uncritically parrot his distortions (13) don't seem bothered by his helpful support for the crass Jew-hatred and historical revisionism of the Holocaust deniers, nor about the falsehoods discovered in his citations. (11, 12)
host is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 01:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Born Against
 
raveneye's Avatar
 
Shorter DeMeo: Chomsky flirts with Jew haters, therefore Comsky is anti-American.

Some info on DeMeo: he's a science crackpot who has convinced himself that he has built a contraption to harvest the energy of the human orgasm to eliminate drought. Seriously:

http://www.orgonelab.org/

And he's been obsessed with the effects of drought on human culture for a long time. Here's the abstract of his U Kansas dissertation (1987):

Quote:
World-wide spatial and temporal patterns of various painful, traumatic, and repressive practices aimed at infants, children, adolescents, and women were developed by systematic analysis of anthropological data on subsistence-level cultures. A 'patrist' culture form was identified which possessed the most extreme antichild, antifemale, antisexual, and violent characteristics, with attitudes, behaviors, and social institutions designed to interfere with the bonding functions between mothers and infants, and young males and females, and for the organized expression of violent, destructive aggression. A 'matrist' culture form which supported and protected maternal-infant and male-female bonds, and which also possessed very low levels of destructive aggression, was also identified. A cross-cultural test confirmed the global validity of the patrist-matrist schema. When the cross-cultural data were mapped, the great desert belt stretching across North Africa, Arabia, the Near East, and into Central Asia, called 'Saharasia', was found to possess the greatest areal extent of most extreme patrist behaviors and social institutions on Earth. Contrarily, those regions most distant from Saharasia, in Oceania and North and South America, were found to possess the most extreme forms of matrist culture. A review of archaeological and historical materials indicated that patrism first developed in Saharasia after 4000-3500 BC, the time of a major ecological transition from relatively wet grassland/forest conditions to arid desert conditions. Settlement and migration patterns of the earliest patrist peoples out of homelands in Arabia (Semites) and Central Asia (Indoaryans) were traced and found to explain the later appearance of patrism in regions outside of Saharasia. Prior to 4000-3500 BC, when Saharasia dried up, archaeological evidence for patrism is generally nonexistent; after this date, patrism is increasingly evident. It is argued that matrism constitutes the innate, inheritable portion of behavior, while patrism is a more recent development related to trauma-inducing social institutions which originally developed under the pressures of desertification. The impact of severe, prolonged desertification stimulated the genesis of patrism, largely through starvation and famine-related traumas (marasmus, kwashiorkor, & c.) which severely disturbed the maternal-infant bond, hurt the child, and thwarted family ties.
I wouldn't waste my time trying to evaluate any of his political writings.
raveneye is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 08:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Addict
 
lindseylatch's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
So, I guess the moral is, nobody's a saint...we all have skeletons in our closets. Crazy shit...
__________________
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
"If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him."
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
-Voltaire
lindseylatch is offline  
 

Tags
called, chomsky, demeo, fictionwriters, james, michael, moore, noam, phd

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360