Physiological Equivalency? - Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Sleepyjack · 01-19-2004, 03:07 AM

OKay, motdakasha posted this in my Testicle Level thread

Quote:

Last I checked testicles were not a physiological equivalent of "boobies." I suggest you take a human sexuality, human development, biology, or physiology class.

And anyways, tits are so cliché.

My question is though (although it doens't really matter whatsoever, like alot of my questions

), is what are some equivalencies between male and female anatomy?

Basically, a crude simplification of both sexes, in terms of differing sexaul parts (i use this term extremely loosely, or more so, in terms of what is normally censored) are:

Guys: Penis and/also testicles

Females: Breasts, Vagina.

So would they be the equivalences then? err? It's just that, then girls get 2 censored zones compared to the guys 1, in that you can't really see one or the other, they're not independant? or are they seperate?

hmmm, i am posting this on whim so it's probably a bad idea. Plus i feel it's a bit of a remove all doubt kinda post. Oh well

*submit*

llama8 · 01-19-2004, 03:34 AM

Well you'll be glad to know everyone starts out as female with the respective gonads.

Men have breasts as well but it takes the combination of Oestrogen and Progesterone to develop these any further. That's why men can still get breast cancer. A fact that unfortunately only a few know.

Now if the body is unchecked the gonads will develop into a female form. It takes hih levels of testosterone to cause the development of the testicles instead. This also causes the sercretion of another hormone which prevents the formation of the uterus.

Theres lost of interesting cases around babies who are born with either both sex organs or with none. Also a few court cases as well....

tisonlyi · 01-19-2004, 03:55 AM

http://www.gendercentre.org.au/ambiguousgenitalia.htm

That'll give you a jist.

01-19-2004, 03:55 AM	#3 (permalink)
tisonlyi Nothing	http://www.gendercentre.org.au/ambiguousgenitalia.htm That'll give you a jist. __________________ "I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--

01-19-2004, 03:34 AM	#2 (permalink)
llama8 Crazy Location: Leicester, UK	Well you'll be glad to know everyone starts out as female with the respective gonads. Men have breasts as well but it takes the combination of Oestrogen and Progesterone to develop these any further. That's why men can still get breast cancer. A fact that unfortunately only a few know. Now if the body is unchecked the gonads will develop into a female form. It takes hih levels of testosterone to cause the development of the testicles instead. This also causes the sercretion of another hormone which prevents the formation of the uterus. Theres lost of interesting cases around babies who are born with either both sex organs or with none. Also a few court cases as well....