Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2005, 06:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insane
 
USC/OU

That stupid TV director cant figure out which camera to use. Getting dizzy from all these ridiculous angles.

21-7 SC. Being a Cal alum, it's hard to root for SC but it's a pac-10 team and a west coast team. so what the hell.
Mobo123 is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 06:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Richmond, VA
Haha, I know what you're talking about. I really don't like it when ABC hosts football games, especially NCAA. Their announcers are ridiculous and boring at that.
Avail is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 06:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Insane
 
Damn, 0U is taking an ass kicking. Tommy Tuberville might as well stop campaigning for votes now. Anyone that doesn't vote USC #1 is an idiot.
Harry Cox is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 08:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Crazy
 
And just think, the line changed to OU -1 today. Wish I would of placed some money on this game! 48-10, what a rout.
__________________
My goal is to be rookie of the year...
LIMilf is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 08:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Float on.... Alright
 
Cycler's Avatar
 
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, i.e. Oklahoma
Here is your ass ou, USC just up and handed it to you. Ouch.
__________________
"I'm not even supposed to be here today."

"I assure you we're open."
Cycler is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 09:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
Laff at Oklahoma! Guess who failed again? Our lovely BCS system! Oklahoma should have NEVER been in this game. Thats obvious at this point. Down with the BCS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Cox
Damn, 0U is taking an ass kicking. Tommy Tuberville might as well stop campaigning for votes now. Anyone that doesn't vote USC #1 is an idiot.
Why are they an idiot? Auburn is still 13-0. All this game proved to me is that there were probably 2 opponents for USC that would have been a much better choice than Oklahoma. Oklahoma embarrassed again. Why can't their be a rule to prevent them from being in another national championship game?
Justsomeguy is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 09:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
Float on.... Alright
 
Cycler's Avatar
 
Location: Where the wind comes sweeping down the plains, i.e. Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justsomeguy
Why can't their be a rule to prevent them from being in another national championship game?
I'd vote for that rule.
__________________
"I'm not even supposed to be here today."

"I assure you we're open."
Cycler is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 10:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
trickyy's Avatar
 
yeah those camera angles were quite the experience.

usc already beat the other two teams, although auburn did improve since they last played (but the sec was weaker than normal).

i was surprised at the game; i thought usc was better last year. and i was a bit worried after the first score. but did anyone at espn predict this correctly? that college gameday crowd was a bit misguided...usc losing in a lopsided contest?
trickyy is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 10:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Met22's Avatar
 
Location: X-posed
SC never a doubt. Love the return glory.

It will be a long time before OU will see a title game again.
__________________
Living on the west end dreaming of the theater playing in the Metropolis - Dream the Dream Live the Dream
Met22 is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by trickyy
but did anyone at espn predict this correctly? that college gameday crowd was a bit misguided...usc losing in a lopsided contest?
No, they had their lips on OU's cock all season long. (EDIT: except for Lee Corso, the wiley old football coach managed to see through all the hype).

It's pretty sweet considering just how wrong they were, and that I myself picked USC.

Imagine if they had Mike Williams... Leinart would have thrown maybe 2 more TDs.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...

Last edited by Spartak; 01-04-2005 at 11:16 PM..
Spartak is offline  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Insane
 
sgn43's Avatar
 
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartak
No, they had their lips on OU's cock all season long. (EDIT: except for Lee Corso, the wiley old football coach managed to see through all the hype).

It's pretty sweet considering just how wrong they were, and that I myself picked USC.

Imagine if they had Mike Williams... Leinart would have thrown maybe 2 more TDs.


not to mention the loss of Whitney Lewis, Winston Justice and Kenechi Udeze. if all those guys didn't declare for the draft or get suspended/ruled ineligible, USC would have won by an even larger margin (which is absolutely absurd to even imagine).


oh, and Spartak...you have the best avatar ever. ever.



Fight On
sgn43 is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 10:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
trickyy's Avatar
 
yeah, then postgame the analysts made quite the shift. now oklahoma didn't even deserve to be playing in the game (nevermind that blowout we foresaw) and we sure wish that those mean presidents would let usc and auburn play each other. i'm sorry, but the situation is much different from last year. vt almost won that game. i doubt auburn would beat usc.

but a tourney would be an improvement anyway. now there is talk of a selection committee since the ap removed their poll. sounds like another dumb idea from the leaders of our higher education system.
trickyy is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:30 AM   #13 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by trickyy
yeah, then postgame the analysts made quite the shift. now oklahoma didn't even deserve to be playing in the game (nevermind that blowout we foresaw) and we sure wish that those mean presidents would let usc and auburn play each other. i'm sorry, but the situation is much different from last year. vt almost won that game. i doubt auburn would beat usc.

but a tourney would be an improvement anyway. now there is talk of a selection committee since the ap removed their poll. sounds like another dumb idea from the leaders of our higher education system.

Thats why I never pay much attention to people on TV. They'll hang from one teams nuts, and as soon as they lose, they'll talk down on them like they shouldn't be playing the game. I'm a huge Auburn fan, and I'm not sure if Auburn could of beat USC, but I'm positive it would of been a much better game than that. Oklahomas secondary is terrible...
JeremyS is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:32 AM   #14 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
I don't see why there should not be a playoff system.

After all basketball and lower-division football already has them in place, why does the premier college sport have to deal with this controversy and frankly bullshit year in and year out ?

And I don't see why NCAA is so against this, the TV revenue generated by the playoffs would be astonishing.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:35 AM   #15 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by trickyy
yeah, then postgame the analysts made quite the shift. now oklahoma didn't even deserve to be playing in the game (nevermind that blowout we foresaw) and we sure wish that those mean presidents would let usc and auburn play each other. i'm sorry, but the situation is much different from last year. vt almost won that game. i doubt auburn would beat usc.
Auburn wouldn't have given up 55 points. VT did not almost win that game to be honest. They were bringing it close at the end. However, Auburn outplayed them the entire game. A few lucky breaks and strong defensive moves really kept VT from getting blown out. USC really struggled against VT as well if you remember. And VT has really improved since then.

You're right, the situation is different from last year. It's worse. Two teams finished undefeated that were not given a shot at the championship. Last year, the BCS gave us a good game. It may have picked the correct teams. This year, it obviously picked the wrong team(OU).
Justsomeguy is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 03:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Curious
 
Shpoop's Avatar
 
Location: NJ (but just for college)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartak
the TV revenue generated by the playoffs would be astonishing.
the revenue generated by companies putting their name on a bowl is astonishing^2. The money they get from the fedex orange bowl, nokia sugar bowl, tostitos fiesta bowl....and all the minor ones too...is rediculous. If they do a playoff system, which i think they should, they would have to keep the names. they would just all the early games the peach bowl, cotton bowl etc, and have the big bowls rotate which are the finals, and which is the championship...it could work
Shpoop is offline  
Old 01-05-2005, 07:48 PM   #17 (permalink)
 
trickyy's Avatar
 
3 teams finished undefeated, don't forget utah.

auburn was definitely in control of the game, but vt managed to make the score close (and failed to convert on a few deep possessions).

usc struggled against teams weaker than vt. this is why i thought the game would be closer. vt and auburn have both improved since they lost to usc, but i still don't think either would beat usc. no way to prove this, just my feeling.

and i don't think a small championship tourney would prevent me from watching the jiffy lube bowl, as long as the teams are evenly matched.
trickyy is offline  
 

Tags
usc or ou

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360