Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2005, 01:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Thank God hockey is back
 
lunchbox's Avatar
 
Location: Deeeeeetroit
Wacky Sabres are at it again. (NHL rule changes)

Some of you may recall the "blue ice" thread posted here before.

It was proposed by the Buffalo Sabres that to make the puck more visible they use light blue ice and orange "blue lines."

well they decided that's not all. they've come up with a new idea for increasing scoring.


here it is:




to me it looks like they're going to make scoring go down because i'd not be able to shoot the puck at that. I'd be averting my eyes because of how hideous that thing is. Your thoughts?
__________________
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

-Douglas Adams
lunchbox is offline  
Old 04-04-2005, 02:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Psycho
 
00111000's Avatar
 
Location: Mostly standing in a blue semi-circle
Changing the size of the nets is not the answer imo. High scoring games are not the problem in hockey these days. The problem is too much defensive play and not enough enforcement of holding and other minor penalties. Some of the most exciting games are low scoring end to end hockey. With todays systems of getting one goal then playing defensive hockey the whole time you hardly see great plays develop. Sure, more scoring will attract a larger crowd but the way the game is played needs to change in order for hockey to become the great sport it once was.

I really think they should look at some of the rules and alter them to better reflect the current game. Get rid of the two line pass so you can encourage a faster breakout. Change the way icing is called to either no touch or have the ref make a decision on if the defensive player could have actually made a play rather than taking the icing call. Changes like this, to me, would bring the game back to the fast paced up and down hockey I fell in love with, not this boring tippy-tappy hockey.

If this new goal is implemented you will have higher scoring until teams and goalies adjust to the new format. If you don't change the way the game is called you'll still have low scoring defensive hockey.

Just one goalies opinion....
__________________
- And so he says, 'I don't like the cut of your jib.' And I go I says, IT'S THE ONLY JIB I GOT, BABY! -
00111000 is offline  
Old 04-04-2005, 03:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Bang bang
 
Spartak's Avatar
 
Location: New Zealand
Exactly get rid of the clutch 'n' grab and the 2 line pass, also maybe trim down on the goalie's equipment, right now you've got a damn Zeppelin in goal.
__________________
I can read your mind... looking at you... I can read your mind...
Spartak is offline  
Old 04-04-2005, 04:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Getting Medieval on your ass
 
Coppertop's Avatar
 
Location: 13th century Europe
Yeah, that's one fugly net. I say take out the red line and let the breakout passes fly. And this coming from a defenseman.
Coppertop is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Oh shit it's Wayne Brady!
 
CityOfAngels's Avatar
 
Location: Passenger seat of Wayne Brady's car.
How about this for a rule?: "In order for the NHL to legitimately be a professional sports league, it's teams and their respective players must actually play hockey."
__________________
The words "love" and "life" go together. It is almost as if they are one. You must love to live, and you must live to love, or you have never lived nor loved at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeraph
...the best way to keep a big secret would be to make it public with disinformation...
CityOfAngels is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Janey's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
i like that last rule. I think removing the redline would be too drastic. and would look weird. Goalie equipement circa early to mid '80's in size would be nice.
Janey is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
"I'm sorry. What was the question?"
 
Daoust's Avatar
 
Location: Paradise Regained
The nets thing won't fly. Not only do they look stupid, nobody wants them, and everybody agrees that more scoring isn't what's needed. The clutching, grabbing and neutral zone trap are what's wrong with the game. Get rid of that, and we'll have a better game. I"m not necessarily an advocate of the bigger ice surface, either. I think it's fine as it is. Watching the Canadian Womens team play (and win convincingly, already up 25-0 gf/ga in this tournament) I have found that the big ice surface makes the game more loose and more boring. I dont' know why that is, but it's what I find.
__________________
I have faith in a few things - divinity and grace
But even when I'm on my knees I know the devil preys
Daoust is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:31 AM   #8 (permalink)
All hail the Mountain King
 
the_marq's Avatar
 
Location: Black Mesa
After watching the World Jr's this winter with the 'no-redline rule.' I was finally converted. I didnt like it before but now I see how it can lead to some really exciting breakaways and game turn arounds. BTW Janey, the redline is still there, just ignored when it comes to offsides. It's still a factor in icing.

I'd also like to see the rules removed on stick curvature. Plenty of guys are already ignoring this rule anyway, but let 'em bend it all they want, it will lead to harder, more accurate shots on net. The only reason stick curves were limited in the first place was so the goalies (in the 1950's) wouldn't get broken bones from hard fast shots, now that they are wearing the equivilent of ballisitc body armour this is no longer an issue. Let the hard ones fly.

Finally, a bigger net is fucking retarded, the idea that a higher scoring game would make the game more marketable is the dumbest thing ever. Look at soccer, the most watched sport in the world, its very rare for a team to score more than 3 goals in a game (and that net is fucking huge). It's not the number of goals that attracts people, its the intensity of play.
__________________
The Truth:

Johnny Cash could have kicked Bruce Lee's ass if he wanted to.

#3 in a series
the_marq is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 08:22 AM   #9 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: Don't worry about it.
I'd rather see hockey back in session before they make ridiculious things like that. I do like the idea for the redlines though.

More scoring isn't going to get hockey better ratings though.

Last edited by Kurant; 04-05-2005 at 08:25 AM..
Kurant is offline  
Old 04-05-2005, 08:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Michigan
How to make hockey more interesting? Cut the salaries & get some players who really WANT to play. We are getting a junior A team here in our town next year. They played two games here, I went to both. Awesome hockey. Young kids who DO have something to prove, living with folks in the town who have an extra room, working 20-30 hours a week as well as hockey practice every day to try & make the college teams. Intensity. Desire. Drive. All things that the NHL doesn't have anymore. I'd rather go watch the juniors any day compared to the Red Wings, and I'm from Michigan.

Bigger nets would only screw up my already high goals-against-average, so I'm against them!
c172g is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
These new suggestions are getting more and more rediculous by the day. That net looks like shit plain and simple, have they not figured out by now that it isn't the nets or the colour of the ice that is wrong with hockey, its the fact they keep on making these new rules such as clutching and grabbing, yet they never call it. I'm disgusted with the game at the moment, I'll be watching the OHL and the QMJHL from now on, hell when and if the NHL comes back who knows if I'll watch it again, I'm just sick of it.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 04:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
Thank God hockey is back
 
lunchbox's Avatar
 
Location: Deeeeeetroit
I'll watch, but I agree they need to stop this bullshit clutch and grab. teams like the Calgary flames from last year have no business in the stanley cup finals clutchers and grabbers with just a few scorers. I'm glad the cleaner of the two won, but some teams just don't even get a shot because of how bs these rules are. My opinion is that scoring would go up by as much as 20% if they just claned up the grabbing. Then again I am a proponent of getting rid of a few teams too so if they did either scoring would go up just as much and if they did both the scoring would go up at least 50% there's too many bs players in the league and too many non-calls. I'll watch till I die, but they do need changes.
__________________
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

-Douglas Adams
lunchbox is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 06:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
Addict
 
CandleInTheDark's Avatar
 
Location: Where the music's loudest
How about when the goalie leaves the crease, you can hit him? That would rock.
__________________
Where there is doubt there is freedom.
CandleInTheDark is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 11:28 AM   #14 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
A lot of good points.

no more 2-line pass rule.
No more limitations on the curvature of the blade.
Smaller goalie pads.
And hitting the goalie if he leaves the crease.

Exactly what the sport needs. If they come back next year and implement these rule changes, I'll watch.

But if they come back next year and don't change anything I find it hard to believe the NHL will get much coverage. ESPN2's ratings are way up this season since the cancelled hockey season has caused them to show more college basketball. They'll stick with it if it brings in mo money...
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 02:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
Thank God hockey is back
 
lunchbox's Avatar
 
Location: Deeeeeetroit
I find it HYSTERICAL that you guys keep recommending that you should allow goalies being hit again...Mr. Bettman was a part of that rule getting added. Hehheh.


I do believe he is the worst thing that ever happened to any sport, ever.
__________________
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

-Douglas Adams
lunchbox is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 03:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
Psycho
 
00111000's Avatar
 
Location: Mostly standing in a blue semi-circle
Allowing the goalie to get hit will probably never happen, it would add more problems than solving them I think. First thing I could think of is that most goalies are the smallest and lightest guys out there and taking a hit from todays power fowards would be crippling to say the least. A head on hit would most likely knock the goalie flat on his back and snap his head into the ice when he lands. Most goalies today where masks that are designed with deflecting shots from the front and sides and they only have a small plate on the back with minimal padding and the result there would be many more concussions.

I would like to see more restrictions placed on when and where the goalie can play the puck like the lines they have in the AHL. Regulating goalies is low in the NHL's list of things to fix in the game. Change the rules that everyone agrees on and open the game back up, bring back the game I love not this trapping defensive play.
__________________
- And so he says, 'I don't like the cut of your jib.' And I go I says, IT'S THE ONLY JIB I GOT, BABY! -
00111000 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 03:29 PM   #17 (permalink)
Her Jay
 
silent_jay's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario for now....
I don't think they should take away the 2 line pass, it just promotes cherry picking. People sitting out by the other teams blueline and waiting for a break away pass. Hitting the goalie while I would have loved to during my playing days the fights that would start because of it would be so many that the next thing you know they'd be trying to get rid of fighting again.

Drop a few teams get the talent level back up to where it used to be instead of this second rate talent that plays 1 shift a game. The rules aren't the problem where scoring is concerned it's the talent of the league or should I say lack of talent that is the problem.
__________________
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
silent_jay is offline  
 

Tags
nhl, rule, sabres, wacky

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360