1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

The works of J. R. R. Tolkien

Discussion in 'Tilted Entertainment' started by Baraka_Guru, Mar 25, 2014.

  1. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    If he doesn't, I do.
     
  2. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    If our resident sensitive poet badass :D doesn't claim it, it's all yours.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Let her have it. I'm not fond of overlarge books if it can be avoided. I'm actually kind of interested in that boxed set floating around that has three separate volumes paginated as one book (as was Tolkien's intention). I'll likely get that one day.
     
  4. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    Thanks! I am in the process of collecting extra books for my future classroom. Obviously, multiple sets of Tolkien's works are a good idea.
     
  5. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    Do you use Tree and Leaf? If I taught literature/creative writing to young people (or older people, if I could get away with it), I'd definitely use "On Fairy-Stories" and "Leaf by Niggle" (in some capacity) as a one-two punch on the fundamentals of creating story rooted in the mythical or fantastical. As I suggested above, the former is explanatory, while the latter is demonstrative. "On Fairy-Stories" is Tolkien's philosophy on fantasy, or mythological narratives, while "Leaf by Niggle" can be read as an allegory of the creative process.

    I can't think of a better example of something that could open young minds to the idea of creating stories than these. I'm speculating, though. I'm not sure how this would work in actual practice.
     
  6. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    Snowy, give me an address via conversation, use a business address if you're more comfortable with that (I understand caution). It might be next week before I can mail it.

    If you like, I'll include the trio in PB that I also have (somewhere). The Hobbit is pretty dogeared, but readable. They'd make good loaners in case they don't get returned to you. Actually I don't see you letting anyone, not even a kid, getting away with not returning one of your books.

    Sometimes having things delivered to work is much easier & safer than home delivery. I came home one afternoon to find a box containing a new 12 string guitar left sitting on our porch by FdX Home Delivery. The driver even stood it up so that anyone walking or driving by could see it. On its side our hedges would've semi-concealed it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2014
  7. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    I have not read this Tree and Leaf you suggest. I'll have to find a copy. The teaching of writing is fast becoming my specialty, so I'm always on the lookout for good resources.

    I don't use Tolkien in teaching much, other than as a reference point with older students, most of whom have read Lord of the Rings or The Hobbit at the very least. At the middle school level, though, it's something I suggest students read as an alternative to a lot of the YA fantasy out there, and that is why I always need more books for my classroom.
     
  8. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    You should at least read Tree and Leaf for yourself. It's like peering into the heart of Tolkien.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    [I probably should have just posted here instead of my blog.

    @Levite @rogue49 @Shadowex3 @amonkie : Feel free to repost your responses from the blog.

    @Levite : For clarity's sake, if you want to repost your first response, I will repost my response to it (and so on), using the quote feature to avoid confusion.

    I figured that a conversation may stem further and would be easier to manage in an already existing thread.]

    Reading this is refreshing to me. However, it's similar to Michael Moorcock's views in his non-fiction on the genre. I suppose I need to keep reminding myself of such thoughts, as they align with my own in varying degrees.

    I don't hate Tolkien or "Tolkienesque fantasy," but that mode of fantasy offers diminishing rewards to me regarding what I hope to experience with the fantastical in literature. The best of it I like, but it does have its limitations and drawbacks.

    For the record, I've never considered The Lord of the Rings my favourite fantasy work. Also, I haven't read the work of China Miéville, though I suppose I should get to it shortly. It has always looked intriguing to me.

    When people dis fantasy—mainstream readers and SF readers alike—they are almost always talking about one sub-genre of fantastic literature. They are talking about Tolkien, and Tolkien's innumerable heirs. Call it 'epic', or 'high', or 'genre' fantasy, this is what fantasy has come to mean. Which is misleading as well as unfortunate.​

    Tolkien is the wen on the arse of fantasy literature. His oeuvre is massive and contagious—you can't ignore it, so don't even try. The best you can do is consciously try to lance the boil. And there's a lot to dislike—his cod-Wagnerian pomposity, his boys-own-adventure glorying in war, his small-minded and reactionary love for hierarchical status-quos, his belief in absolute morality that blurs moral and political complexity. Tolkien's clichés—elves 'n' dwarfs 'n' magic rings—have spread like viruses. He wrote that the function of fantasy was 'consolation', thereby making it an article of policy that a fantasy writer should mollycoddle the reader.​

    That is a revolting idea, and one, thankfully, that plenty of fantasists have ignored. From the Surrealists through the pulps—via Mervyn Peake and Mikhael Bulgakov and Stefan Grabiński and Bruno Schulz and Michael Moorcock and M. John Harrison, and I could go on—the best writers have used the fantastic aesthetic precisely to challenge, to alienate, to subvert and undermine expectations.​

    Of course I'm not saying that any fan of Tolkien is no friend of mine—that would cut my social circle considerably. Nor would I claim that it's impossible to write a good fantasy book with elves and dwarfs in it—Michael Swanwick's superb Iron Dragon's Daughtergives the lie to that. But given that the pleasure of fantasy is supposed to be in its limitless creativity, why not try to come up with some different themes, as well as unconventional monsters? Why not use fantasy to challenge social and aesthetic lies?​

    Thankfully, the alternative tradition of fantasy has never died. And it's getting stronger. Chris Wooding, Michael Swanwick, Mary Gentle, Paul di Filippo, Jeff VanderMeer, and many others, are all producing works based on fantasy's radicalism. Where traditional fantasy has been rural and bucolic, this is often urban, and frequently brutal. Characters are more than cardboard cutouts, and they're not defined by race or sex. Things are gritty and tricky, just as in real life. This is fantasy not as comfort-food, but as challenge.​

    The critic Gabe Chouinard has said that we're entering a new period, a renaissance in the creative radicalism of fantasy that hasn't been seen since the New Wave of the sixties and seventies, and in echo of which he has christened the Next Wave. I don't know if he's right, but I'm excited. This is a radical literature. It's the literature we most deserve.​

     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    No need to repost, my point was more generic than specifically directed to Tolkien. (gotta give him his due though)
    Basically, enjoy what works for you. No rules.
    I find that I often like the things critics nit-pick about...for any media, topic or author. (Dr. Suess is just as enjoyable as HP Lovecraft...both are fantasy in their own way)
    The nay-sayers can have their own meal...I'll eat mine with a smile.
     
  12. Levite

    Levite Levitical Yet Funky

    Location:
    The Windy City
    Good idea to move it over to this thread, @Baraka_Guru! I think in the interests of ease of following the lines of conversation, I will repost our following exchange here:

     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Shadowex3

    Shadowex3 Very Tilted

    To put it another way: Tolkien is an original which has been imitated so much, and sometimes so poorly, that the original itself begins to be looked on with distaste. Like eating at taco bell so many times that someone develops a dread of actual mexican food as well.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Levite

    Levite Levitical Yet Funky

    Location:
    The Windy City
    Very much so. People have become jaded by inferior works, and have lost appreciation for original artists. I remember when Branagh's "Mary Shelly's Frankenstein" came out, which was a rather decent, comparatively faithful and fresh adaptation of the novel, it tanked at the box office and critically, because people found it derivative and cliched. As far as I could see, this was largely because people were so over-Frankensteined by crappy adaptations and Frankenstein-influenced later stories, films, and TV shows, that something relatively faithful to the novel seemed trite, because the novel had become lost in the inferior crap its imitators had pumped out. But of course, pretty much every genre of art has its great original works and artists that have become underappreciated either widely or by certain segments of the populace.

    That kind of jadedness is then further complicated by the intellectual jadedness of postmodernist form criticism, the discourse that dominates academic literature and media studies these days.
     
  15. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    I'm rewatching Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring at the moment, and I'm pretty sure that after I'm done with this current marathon, I'm going to be in for a lengthy rereading.
     
  16. Levite

    Levite Levitical Yet Funky

    Location:
    The Windy City
    BTW, have you guys read Tolkien's Beowulf? It's a gorgeous translation, I think. Easily as good as Seamus Haney's, though very different in style.
     
  17. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    I haven't. I like Seamus Haney's a lot.

    EDIT: Ooooh, it's in at the public library. I'll have to put a hold on it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2015
  18. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    I keep getting tempted by it in the fantasy section of the bookstore I go to. I've read only Heaney's version. Though, if you haven't read John Gardner's novel Grendel, do it.
     
  19. Levite

    Levite Levitical Yet Funky

    Location:
    The Windy City
    Tolkien's Beowulf is totally worth it. Even better, if possible, than his Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl, and Sir Orfeo, which was remarkable in every way.

    I have read Gardner's Grendel, and found it very nicely done. I also liked his Moriarty, which employed the same literary trick, but in the world of Sherlock Holmes.
     
  20. Chris Noyb

    Chris Noyb Get in, buckle up, hang on, & be quiet.

    Location:
    Large City, TX
    I had previously posted that in my thrift store & re-sale shop searches I frequently find Tolkien's more common works, but had never seen The Silmarillion.

    On Saturday I scored a hardback copy of The Silmarillion.

    The good news: It's in VG condition, and still has the fold-out map in it (I'm guessing that frequently goes missing???).
    The bad news: It's missing the dust jacket. Although it's marked First American Edition, it appears to be a fourth printing; per my research it has has no real dollar value.

    I ran across this, and found it interesting as a book collector:

    Collecting The silmarillion by J.R.R Tolkien - rare, limited and signed editions

    -----------------------------------

    I'm tempted to ask my deceased neighbors heir, his sister, if she has done anything with his book collection. I'd like to know if I did indeed give him the large trilogy book, since I can't find it...which sucks since I promised it to @snowy. She did tell me that many of his books are musty and moldy. That doesn't surprise me since he lived for at least six years with no AC in high humidity Houston.
     
    • Like Like x 1